High Court of Kerala Judgements

Judges:

29 February, 2000·Dated this the 8th day of November, 2016 L.A.A No.610/2004 -4- ...

Judges: S Sankarasubban

29 February, 2000·S. Sankarasubban, J. 1. In O.P. No. 32594 of 1999, there are two petitioners. They are the existing operators operating on the route Cheepumkal-Ernakulam via. Kottayam. Respondents 4 to 6 applied for the grant of the regular permits on the routes Puthuppally-Ernakulam via. Kottayam, Katoor Bus stand...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·Dated this the 8th day of November, 2016 L.A.A No.610/2004 -4- ...

Judges:

29 February, 2000·The Original petition has been filed by one among the claimants in LAR No.290/2010 on the file of the Second Additional Sub Court, Thiruvananthapuram. Delay in answering the reference made over the claim for enhanced compensation has prompted the petitioner/claimant to file this original petition to...

Judges: A Pasayat, K Radhakrishnan

28 February, 2000·Arijit Pasayat, C. J. 1. Magna Carta of English Law, contains a clause which reads as follows :No free man shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed; nor shall we go upon him, nor send upon him, but by the lawful judgment of his pears, and by the law...

Judges: A Pasayat, K Radhakrishnan

28 February, 2000·Arijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. In this application under Section 41 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (in short "the Act") read with Rule 41(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Rules, 1963 (in short "the Rules"), only dispute relates to the question whether assessee was entitled to claim exemption i...

Judges:

27 February, 2000·The original petition is filed in the year 2002 challenging disconnection of electricity supply.2. Considering the nature of the reliefs sought for in the original petition, this Court is of the view that the original petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is closed as i...

Judges:

26 February, 2000·-------------------Petitioner is a retired mechanic from the Regional Workshop, Mavelikkara of the first respondent. The grievance voiced by the petitioner in this writ petition is non disbursal of pensionary benefits to the petitioner. In that regard, petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation,...

Judges:

26 February, 2000·Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the parties have settled the matter out of court. The appellants do not intend to prosecute the matter further. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.cks A.Hariprasad, J.S.A.No.833 of 2000 JUDGMENT 20th Ja...

Judges:

26 February, 2000·Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the parties have settled the matter out of court. The appellants do not intend to prosecute the matter further. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.cks A.Hariprasad, J.S.A.No.833 of 2000 JUDGMENT 20th Ja...