Mohammad Shameer vs State Of Karnataka Mines And Geology And Others
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. 3. The factual matrix of the case are that; on 30.1.2018 the complainant and two others one home guard checked the vehicle bearing No.KA.19 AB.0011 which was found ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Aiyappa Swamy Chinnaiah vs M/S Amicorp Management India Pvt Ltd And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
22 October, 2019·9. After filing of the arbitration proceedings, there were two developments. Appellant issued notice on 31.05.2019 to respondent No.1 invoking Arbitration Clause of the agreement and nominating one Sri B.S.Harish Kumar, Advocate as Arbitrator. As could be found from the postal ackn...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Prahlad K Hanumanthaiah vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·(By Sri C.R.Raghavendra Reddy, Advocate) AND: …Petitioner 1. The State of Karnataka by Jeevan Bheema Nagar Police Station Bengaluru-560 075 Represented by State Public Prosecutor High Court Building Bengaluru-560 001. 2. Sri Ravikumar K. Naik S/o Kuba Singh Aged about 48 years R/at Omshakthi Nilaya ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Rocky Ferrao vs Rahasa Rai B
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·3. The factual matrix of the case are that; on 20.12.2017 the complainant and two others one home guard checked the vehicle bearing No.KA.19 D.8571 which was found loaded with sand and on enquiry the driver admitted that the same was being transported as per instructions of t...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Vijaya Kumar V
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·RESIDING AT NO.23, 19TH MAIN, REVENUE LAYOUT, PADMANABHANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 070. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.R.V.ANAND, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI.H.THIMMAPPA GOWDA, S/O R.HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.484, 12TH MAIN ROAD, MUNESHWARA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU – 26. ... ...
High Court Of Karnataka
B H Nizar vs Rahasa Rai B
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·3. The factual matrix of the case are that; on 30.4.2018 the complainant and two others one home guard checked the vehicle bearing No.KA.19 AA.9687 which was found loaded with sand and on enquiry the driver admitted that the same was being transported as per instructions of the owner of the...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Manjula J vs Sri Muthukumar
Judges: B A Patil
22 October, 2019·2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/accused. Learned counsel for the respondent remained absent. 3. Though this case is listed for admission, with the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner/accused, the same is taken up for final disposal. 4. It i...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Mohammed Sufiyan vs Sri Syed Abdul
Judges: S G Pandit
22 October, 2019·[BY SRI. V. SRINIVASAN, ADV.] ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSE COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.4.2019 PASSED IN S.C.No.1685/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSE JUDGE, M...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Street Smart Media vs The Ministry Of Defence And Others
Judges: Abhay S Oka, S R Krishna Kumar
22 October, 2019·JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2. The appellant is the writ petitioner. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has vacated the interim order granted by him on 23rd July 2019 and 30th August 2019. It is not in dispute that in a civil suit filed on 8th July ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.