Sri Ramu Major vs Smt A S Seshirekha
Judges: S G Pandit
27 November, 2019·[BY SRI A GOPIPRAKASH, ADV.-ABSENT] AND: ... PETITIONER SMT. A.S. SESHIREKHA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS W/O SRI. A.N. SUBBARAYA SETTY R/AT NO.479, 4TH ‘B’ CROSS 7TH MAIN ROAD, R.P.C. LAYOUT HAMPINAGAR BANGALORE-560 040. ... RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF SMALL CAUSE ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Suresh K vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: S Sujatha
27 November, 2019·SRI SURESH K., S/O KORAGU AJILA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS UJIRADKA HOUSE, NALKOOR VILLAGE , NADUGALLU POST, SULLIA TALUK, D.K DISTRICT-574218 ... PETITIONER [BY SRI K.RAVISHANKAR, ADV.] AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE, VIDHANA SUDHA, BANGALORE-560001...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Prakash And Others vs Plus Transport Company No 209 And Others
Judges: S R Krishna Kumar
27 November, 2019·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Lakshmamma W/O And Others vs Sri Mohammed Muzamil Khan And Others
Judges: S R Krishna Kumar M
27 November, 2019·2. SMT.JAYASHEELA D/O LATE KABBALE GOWDA NOW AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS. 3. ERAMMA D/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA NOW AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT DYAVARASE GOWDANA DODDI WARD NO.1 RAMANAGARA TOWN. PERMANENT R/AT DUNNASANDRA BHUTHA HUNASE POST MARALAVADI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK PIN – 560 062. 4. SRI.MOHAMM...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri S Rajashekar vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: G Narendar
27 November, 2019·This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to quash the order dated 13.07.2018 disallowing the prayer sought in the application filed by the petitioner and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, the Court passed the ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Apple India Private Limited
Judges: S Sujatha
27 November, 2019·8. It was argued that only during the queries raised on the petitioner while answering to question No.4 to the statement dated 28.6.2017, the petitioner admitted the fact that in very small percentage of cases, if the damage is not covered under warranty, they support the custom...
High Court Of Karnataka
Vinay Kumar @ Viniya vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
27 November, 2019·STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJGOPALNAGARA POLICE STATION, BENGALURU – 560 058 & S.P.P HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU – 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI ROHITH , HCGP.) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Dileep K vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
27 November, 2019·STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KUVEMPUNAGARA P.S. REP BY HCGP., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE – 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ROHITH B.J., HCGP.) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.38/20...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sowmya V D/O Mr Venkatesh C A vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
27 November, 2019·THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent – State. Perused the records. 2. Petitioner is arraigned as accused No.36 in C...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mohan vs The State Of Karnataka
Judges: K N Phaneendra
27 November, 2019·THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJAGOPAL NAGAR POLICE STATION, BANGALORE – 560 070. REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE – 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI ROHITH B.J., HCGP.) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CRIMINAL PETITION CODE, PRAYING TO ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.