Chandramma W/O Late Krishna And Others vs Chandra And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
20 November, 2019·2. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming compensation for the death of one Krishnanaika in a road traffic accident. The claimants are wife, children and mother of the deceased Krishnanaika. It is stated that on 19.10.2011, when the deceas...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Icici Lombard Company Ltd vs Sri Mohammed Sardar @ Sardar Pasha And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
20 November, 2019·THIS M.F.A COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T This Insurer’s appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 03.12.2013 passed in MVC No.2163/2012 on the file of MACT, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore. 2. The claimants are pa...
High Court Of Karnataka
H Sachindra vs Ranath Ariga K
Judges: R Devdas
20 November, 2019·3 . SMT SUMA W/O SRI UMAKANTH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT BIRATH BAIL KASARAGODU, KERELA STATE 671121 4 . SMT SOUMYA W/O BIPIN BEKAL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS NO. 306, 2ND FLOOR 11TH CROSS, ISEC MAIN ROAD NAGARABHAVI BANGALORE-560072 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE) AND S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Syed Khalandar And Others vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: K Somashekar
20 November, 2019·(By Sri Thejesh .P - HCGP) ... Petitioners ... Respondent ****** This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to, set aside the order dated 20.06.2015 passed by the C.J. (Jr. Dn.,) and J.M.F.C., Jagalur in C.C.No.3...
High Court Of Karnataka
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Sudhakara Poojary And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
20 November, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHESH KIRAN SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.02.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO.423/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDL. MACT, KUNDAPURA AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS....
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Mahadevamma W/O Srinivasa vs K B Krishna And Others
Judges: S G Pandit
20 November, 2019·4. The claimant got examined herself as P.W.1 and also examined P.W.2 apart from marking the documents as Ex.P1 to Ex.P11. The respondent/insurer marked Ex.R1 copy of the policy. 5. The Tribunal based on the material on record awarded total compensation of Rs.4,65,000/- with interest at th...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Shivaswamy N vs The Managing Director K
Judges: S G Pandit
20 November, 2019·4. The claimant got himself examined as P.W.1 and also examined the doctor as P.W.2 apart from marking the documents as Ex.P1 to Ex.P13. The respondent/ Corporation examined R.W.1 and marked the document as Ex.R1. 5. The tribunal, on appreciating the material on record awarded total comp...
High Court Of Karnataka
Baira Kottary A Trust And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Ashok S Kinagi, Ravi Malimath
20 November, 2019·3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MANGALORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MANGALURU, DISTRICT: D.K.-575 003. 4. KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT M.C.C. COMPLEX, NEAR CANARA CLUB KADRI, MANGALURU DISTRICT: D.K-575 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ….RESPON...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Sharadamma D/O H S Shivappa vs Smt Susheelamma W/O H P Sadashivaiah And Others
Judges: H P Sandesh
20 November, 2019·This R.F.A. is filed under Section 96 of CPC passed in O.S. No. 895/2005 on the file of Prl. Judge, Court of Small Causes and Senior Civil Judge, Mysore, dismissing the suit for declaration, possession and mesne profits and etc. This R.F.A. coming on for further arguments this day, the Court deliver...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.