Shree Enterprises A Proprietary Concern And Others vs The Commercial Tax Officer Gm Enf
Judges: S Sujatha
14 March, 2019·4. Learned HCGP appearing for the revenue would submit that the contents of the impugned order indicates the quantification of the penalty and fine payable under Section 130(1) or 130(2) of CGST Act. It is a bonafide mistake committed in quoting a wrong provision of law. I...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri G S Shivakumar vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, L Narayana Swamy
14 March, 2019·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY KHANIJA...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited A Company vs Commercial Tax Officer And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
14 March, 2019·2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI T.K.VEDAMURTHY, AGA.] THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.04.2018 PASSED...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Mohammed Zabibulla vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
14 March, 2019·... PETITIONER 2. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY OPPOSITE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT DAVANAGERE – 577 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, OPPOSITE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT DAVANAGERE – 577 001. 4. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt S Sowbhagya And Others vs Smt Nagasuma
Judges: B Veerappa
14 March, 2019·2. Succinctly stated, the facts of the case are that the plaintiff-respondent herein had instituted a civil suit against the defendants-petitioners herein with the following prayers: a) Mandatory injunction directing the defendants to demolish the unlawful construction made in violation of ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri H M Nataraj And Others vs The Government Of India Ministry Of External Office And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
14 March, 2019·ORDER Sri.R.P.Somashekaraiah, learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri.V.Shivareddy, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondents 2 & 3. Taking into account the order which this Court proposes to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent No.1. Petitions are admitted for...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt G V Nagarathnamma vs Smt T R Vinutha
Judges: B Veerappa
14 March, 2019·O R D E R The petitioner - plaintiff filed these writ petitions against the order dated 2.2.2019 on I.A. Nos.20 to 22 in O.S. No.57/2010 dismissing the applications filed by the plaintiff with costs of Rs.500/-. 2. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance to enforce the agreement of sal...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri P Manjunath vs Canara Bank Manipal Branch Pavithra
Judges: Alok Aradhe
14 March, 2019·THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: O R D E R Mr. L.Sreekanta Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. H.S.Rukkoji Rao, learned Counsel for the respondent. The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri B H Chandrashekara And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, L Narayana Swamy
14 March, 2019·3. SRI R. RENUKAMBA, W/O P RAMACHANDRAIAH AGED 51 YEARS NO.14, 3RD CROSS, BIRAVESHWARA NAGARA, …2 MAGADI MAIN ROAD, SUNKADA KATTE, BENGALURU- 560091. 4. SRI. J.P BARGESHAPPA S/O T.L PATTAPPA AGED 55 YEARS NO.19, FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, SRIDEVINAGAR, OPP. RAVINANDANA PALACE, BANGALORE-91, BENGALURU. 5. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri N Mahantanna vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, L Narayana Swamy
14 March, 2019·2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA 3. TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, DISTRICT CHITRADURGA 4. S UMAPATHI, S/O M.R. THIPPESWAMY, AGED 48 YEARS. R/AT NAYAKANAHATTI, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 5. T MANJULA, W/O SRIKANTH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEAR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.