Smt Padmaja vs The Bengaluru Development Authority
Judges: S Sujatha
25 March, 2019·(BY SRI PRAKASH.H.M., ADVOCATE) AND: THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU – 560 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS …PETITIONER COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI VIVEK YAVAGAL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Radhamma And Others vs Sri Ramaiah And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
25 March, 2019·1. SRI. RAMAIAH, S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.121, RAMAKRISHNA BLOCK, 1ST MAIN ROAD, THYAGARAJANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 028. 2. SMT.SARASWATHAMMA W/O SRI.SHESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT GUDIMAVI VILLAGE, KUMBALGODU POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRI...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mrs Pramila vs The State Election Commission And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
25 March, 2019·4. The Election Returning Officer Office of the Thasildar Hunsur Taluk Mysuru District – 571 105. 5. Mrs. K.K. Leelavathi Aged about 38 years W/o K. M. Manchanaika Kattegat Village Hanagodu Hobli Hunsur Taluk Mysuru District – 571 105. … Respondents (By Sri. M.A. Subramani – HCGP for R-2 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Rajanna vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
25 March, 2019·2. MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU – 570 005. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU-570 005. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri B.J.ESHWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1; Sri T.P.VIVEKANANDA, ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S K V Lakefront Apartment Owners vs Sri Papani Sreeram And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
25 March, 2019·ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SMT. PAMPANI PRAMEELA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O N.O BHUJAGENDRA RAO NO.4-1270, OPP MILK DIARY, VELLORE ROAD, GREAMSPET, CHITOOR-517002. ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. M/S SRI K.V. INFRA A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS, a) SRI. S. MURALI KUMAR, S/O KRISHNAM NAID...
High Court Of Karnataka
Range Forest Officer Channagiri Range And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
25 March, 2019·3. DY.CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS BHADRAVATHI DIVISION, BHADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTIRCT-577202 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI D.R. ANANDEESWAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) …… THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 13.12.2018 PASSED BY LEARN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri H S Somashekara vs The Karnataka State Pollution Control Board Parisara And Others
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, L Narayana Swamy
25 March, 2019·ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 05.01.2019 seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of memo. 4. Registry shall return Annexure-F, if such a request is ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Board Of Management Of Bishop Cotton Women’S Christian vs Dr K Vijayalakshmi D/O Late V Krishnamurthy And Others
Judges: R Devdas
25 March, 2019·ORDER R. DEVDAS J., (ORAL): The respondent No.1 was appointed as a Lecturer in Tamil department of the respondent No.2 – institution. The petitioner - Board of Management, on 09.06.2017 having felt that the Tamil Department of the respondent No.2 - institution had become redundant, re...
High Court Of Karnataka
Bapuji Vidyarthi Nilaya vs The Additional Land Acquistion Officer Bengaluru Development And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
25 March, 2019·1. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISTION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK, BENGALURU-20 2. THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK BENGALURU-20. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri G.H.RAVIKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR Sri B.S.SACHIN, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED U...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shivaprakasha vs Puttaswamy And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
25 March, 2019·2. The plaintiffs filed suit for partition and separate possession against the defendants in respect of suit schedule properties contending that the suit schedule properties are joint family properties and there was no partition. The defendants filed written statement denying the ave...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.