Sri D M Shivaprasad vs The Secretary
Judges: Krishna S Dixit
28 February, 2019·The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Bengaluru Rural, B.D.A.Complex, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560 034 …Petitioner ... Respondent (By Sri.Dildar Shiralli, HCGP) These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondent to consider an...
High Court Of Karnataka
A M G Surendar vs Mr K V Munirajappa And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
28 February, 2019·2. The Assistant Commissioner, Doddabalapura Sub-Division, Doddabalapura-561203. 3. The Tahsildar, Hoskote Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District-562114. ... Respondents (By Sri. Vignesh Shetty, Advocate for C/R1; Smt. Savithramma, HCGP for R2 and R3) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Venkatesh And Others vs The State Of Karnataka Department Of And Others
Judges: S N Satyanarayana
28 February, 2019·(BY SRI NAVEEN J N, ADV.) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA-571511 ... PETITIONERS 3. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571511 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri S N Shivakumar vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: S Sunil Dutt Yadav
28 February, 2019·3. Assistant Commissioner Mandya Sub Division, Mandya District-571 401. 4. Panchayath Development Officer Agasanapura Grama Panchayath, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya District-571 401. 5. Executive Officer Taluka Panchayath, Malavalli Taluk, Mandya District-571 401. ... Respondents (By Sri. M.A.Sub...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K Shivaraj Shetty vs State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
28 February, 2019·… Petitioner 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments, Mangaluru – 575 001. 4. The Secretary, Sunkadakatte Kordabbu Daivasthana, Poshaka Samithi (Regd) Urva Stores, Mangaluru – 575 004. … Respondents (By Sri.V. Shivareddy, HCGP for R1 to R3; Sri. Pundikai...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Kudupa Cultural Association A vs State Of Karnataka Through And Others
Judges: Alok Aradhe
28 February, 2019·4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH BANGALORE – 560 009. 5. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CUBBON PARK SUB DIVISION BANGALORE – 560 001. 6. INSPECTOR OF POLICE ASHOK NAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU-560 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, A.G.A.) THIS WR...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Ramachandra Rai vs Sri G Chandrashekara Salian
Judges: H B Prabhakara Sastry
28 February, 2019·7. Heard the arguments from both side and perused the materials placed before this Court, including the impugned judgment and lower Court records. 8. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as per their ranks before the trial Court. 9. In the trial Court, the complainan...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Karam Chand Thapar & Brothers vs Karnataka Power Corporation Limited Shakthi Bhavan
Judges: Alok Aradhe
28 February, 2019·… PETITIONER … RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS LEADING TO THE ISSUANCE OF TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 08.11.2018 AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Puttaswamaiah vs Sri Shivanna And Others
Judges: B M Shyam Prasad
28 February, 2019·1. SRI. SHIVANNA SON OF SRI. SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SINCE DEAD BY IN LR. 1(a) MASTER YOGESH SON OF SRI. SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS RESIDING AT ANEKEMPANAHALLI VILLAGE MADBAL HOBLI MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER AND GUARDIAN. 2. SMT. SOWBHAG...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Rajalakshmi W/O Late vs The Divisional Manager The Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
28 February, 2019·6. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 contested the petition. On trial, the Tribunal held that the accident was due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by respondent No.1. None of the respondents have challenged the said findings. Therefore, findings with regard to rashness and negligence of responden...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.