IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION Nos.8634-8645/2018 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. VENKATESH S/O THIMMARAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2. SMT. SAKAMMA W/O THIMMAIAH K V AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 3. SRI SIDDAPPA S/O BYRANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 4. SRI APPAJI S/O BYRAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 5. SRI CHIKKATHIMMAIAH S/O LATE CHIKKANNA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 6. SMT. BYRAMMA W/O LATE ANDANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 7. SRI NAGARAJU S/O NINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 8. SRI BYRAPPA S/O BYRAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 9. SRI MUTHAIAH S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 10. SRI MUDINARAYNAPPA S/O ELARAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 11. SRI VENKATESH S/O SANJEEVAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 12. SRI MUTHAIAH S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS ALL ARE R/A MUDDAPURA- KARENAHALLI VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571511.
(BY SRI NAVEEN J N, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA-571511 ... PETITIONERS 3. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-571511 (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA) ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-3 TO FURNISH CERTIFIED COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL GRANT ORDER; OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM AND SAGUVALI CHIT IN RESPECT OF LANDS BEARING SY. NOS. 73/2, 74/3, 74/4, 74/5, 74/6, 74/7, 74/8, 74/9, 20/1, 20/7, 20/3 AND 59/22 SITUATED AT MUDDAPURA - KARENAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 10.11.2017 VIDE ANNEX-E, E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6, E7, E8, E9, E10 AND E11 RESPECTIVELY TO THE WRIT PETITIONS.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER On 25.02.2019, a memo was filed seeking withdrawal of these writ petitions, as having become infructuous. However, in the said memo, writ petitions numbers were mentioned as W.P.Nos.8634-8644/2018, whereas in this batch, the numbers are W.P.Nos.8634- 8645/2018. Hence, these matters were ordered to be listed today.
2. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners files a fresh memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petitions as having become infructuous by mentioning correct numbers such as W.P.No.8634-8645/2018. The same is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructous.
Sd/- JUDGE mpk/-*