Sri K N Gopalkrishna vs Sri Chirangilal Jain
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Regular
26 February, 2019·(By Sri. Gangadhara Aithal S., Advocate) AND Sri. Chirangilal Jain, S/o Sri. Pannalal Jain, Hindu, Aged about 47 years, Residing at “Rajakamal” No.55/50, 64th Cross, 4th Block, 10th E Main Road, S.S.I. Area, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru-560 010. (By Sri.V.B. Shivakumar, Advocate for R-1) …Appellant …Respo...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt R Janaki And Others vs Sri P P Bhaskar And Others
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Regular
26 February, 2019·2. The suit is in respect of a passage. The entire property bearing No.18, East Anjaneya Temple, Basavanagudi, measuring East to West 110 ft. and North to South 30 ft. earlier belonged to Lakshminarayana Rao. After his death in the year 1967, his wife Sundaramma and children sold a porti...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Tata Aig General Insurance Company Ltd vs Ghouse Mohiddin And Others
Judges: K Somashekar Mfa
26 February, 2019·... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PATEL .D. KAREGOWDA – ADV., FOR R-1; R-2 & R-3 - SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.07.2014 PASSED IN MVC NO. 89/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MACT-X, TUMKUR, AWARDING COMPENSATION O...
High Court Of Karnataka
The Programme Director And Others
Judges: Ashok G Nijagannavar
26 February, 2019·2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT, AUTHORITY, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, (NELAMANGALA – HASSAN DIVISION), KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TECHNICAL MANAGER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, BENGALURU. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ARBITRATOR (N.H.48), MINI VIDHANA SO...
High Court Of Karnataka
Jayalakshmamma W/O Nagaraj vs Ravi Kumar And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal Miscellaneous
26 February, 2019·J U D G M E N T Challenge of the claimant in this appeal to the award passed by MACT, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore (SCCH-4) in MVC No.5462/2008 is limited to the question of liability of the insurer . 2. Appellant was claimant in MVC No.5462/2008. Respondent No.1 is owner of offending ve...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri K S Nagesha Rao vs Sree Shanmuga Traders No 29 And Others
Judges: S Sujatha, Mohammad Nawaz
26 February, 2019·6. THE MANAGER M/s ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED NO.1001/156, JAYALAKSHMI MANSION 2ND FLOOR, Dr. RAJKUMAR RAOD, 4TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE 560010. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.JAYAPRAKASH, ADV. FOR R-1; SRI B.PRADEEP, ADV. FOR R-3; SMT.SHWETHA ANAND, ADV. FOR R-4; SRI A.N.KRISHNA ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs Sri T Rathnappa And Others
Judges: K Somashekar Mfa
26 February, 2019·JUDGMENT Heard the learned counsel for the appellant - Insurance Company and the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and perused the impugned judgment and award rendered by the Tribunal and so also other material available on record. 2. The Insurance Company has preferre...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Avamma And Others vs Mr Yashwanth And Others
Judges: Mohammad Nawaz
26 February, 2019·JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the inadequacy of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MVC No.939/2011 by the MACT, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru dated 11.01.2013, the claimants have preferred this appeal, seeking enhancement of compensation. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the ap...
High Court Of Karnataka
B M Chiranjeevi vs The Divisional Manager Oriental Insurnce Co Ltd And Others
Judges: S Sujatha, Mohammad Nawaz
26 February, 2019·2. Claim petition was filed by the claimant contending that on 22.07.2007 he met with the road traffic accident owing to the actionable negligence of the driver of the Tata Sumo bearing Reg. No.KA-02-B-4373 as a result of which, he suffered grievous injuries and was shifted to hospital for m...
High Court Of Karnataka
M Vignesh vs The Managing Director B M T C
Judges: K Somashekar Mfa
26 February, 2019·2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and award dated 24.03.2016 rendered by the Tribunal in MVC No.1121/2015 seeking enhancement of the compensation. 3. The factual matrix of the appeal is as under: It is stated in the claim petition that on 12.02.2015 at about 3.55 ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.