IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.6965 OF 2017 (AA) BETWEEN:
SIDDAPPA, S/O REVAIAH @, KURUDAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT, MADUGIRI PALYA, GOTTIGERE DAKALE, HUTRIDURGA HOBLOI, KUNIGAL TALUK. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.B.N.SHIVANNA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. THE PROGRAMME DIRECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, NH-48, BENGALURU.
2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT, AUTHORITY, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, (NELAMANGALA – HASSAN DIVISION), KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
3. THE TECHNICAL MANAGER, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, BENGALURU.
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ARBITRATOR (N.H.48), MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, TUMKURU DISTRICT, TUMKURU. ...RESPONDENTS **** THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(C) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE DATED 09.02.2016 IN A.A.NO.29/2015 AND GRANT THE BALANCE ENHANCED COMPENSATION OF RS.14,50,650/- AS PRAYED FOR IN THE APPLICATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellant absent. No representation.
2. In this case, there is a peremptory order for compliance of office objections within a period of three weeks. If the office objections are not complied within such period, the appeals shall be listed for dismissal.
3. Even today, the counsel for the appellant has not appeared.
4. In view of the office note, it is evident that, the office objections are not complied with.
5. Hence, this Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE SJ