Mrs Ruby Philomena Rebello Also vs Anthony Britto
Judges: P B Bajanthri
16 August, 2019·NIL ... RESPONDENT THIS PROBATE CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER PART IX (SECTION 278) OF THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT OF 1925, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO GRANT LETTER OF ADMINISTRATION IN RESPECT OF THE ESTATE OF WING COMMANDER (RETD) IAN ANTHONY REBELLO DECEA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Bharathi Axa Gic Ltd vs Srinivas S G And Others
Judges: Krishna S Dixit M
16 August, 2019·2. SYED KAREEM, S/O SYED GHOUSE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT G.C.R. COLONY, SANTHEPET, TUMAKURU-572 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.SHANTHARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 11.10.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.225/2016 ON THE ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Dr D Sanna Durgappa vs The Registrar Council Section Indian Institute Of
Judges: P S Dinesh Kumar, Abhay S Oka
16 August, 2019·Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 PRESENT Next >...
High Court Of Karnataka
Ms Mary Susan George Christian vs Nil
Judges: P B Bajanthri
16 August, 2019·… PETITIONER NIL ... RESPONDENT THIS PROBATE CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER PART IX, (SECTION 270, 273 AND 276) OF THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925, AND THAT SHE MAY BE ALLOWED TO PROVE THE AFORESAID WILL DATED 8TH DECEMBER 2014 IN COMMON FORM AND THAT PROBATE THEREOF, TO HAVE E...
High Court Of Karnataka
B C Basavarajappa
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
16 August, 2019·(By Sri. N.Nandan, Advocate-Absent) AND 1. Smt. K.O.Jayamma, W/o. Basavarajappa B.C., Aged about 50 years, 2. Kumari Nayana D/o. Basavarajappa B.C., Aged about 10 years, 3. Chi. Naveen, S/o. Basavarajappa B.C., Aged about 17 years, Since petitioner No. Minors rep by their Mother and guardian b...
High Court Of Karnataka
S C Mruthyunjayappa vs Ravi Kumar The Chairman
Judges: Ravi Malimath, B M Shyam Prasad
16 August, 2019·... PETITIONER (BY SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY M.C., ADVOCATE FOR SRI NATARAJ G., ADVOCATE) AND: RAVI KUMAR THE CHAIRMAN, PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, BELLARY. ... RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH UNDER SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Mr Reginald Charles Rufus vs Nil
Judges: P B Bajanthri
16 August, 2019·NIL ... RESPONDENT THIS PROBATE CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER PART IX, (SECTION 270, 273 AND 276) OF THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925, AND THAT HE MAY BE ALLOWED TO PROVE THE AFORESAID WILL DATED 14TH DECEMBER 2010 IN COMMON FORM AND THAT PROBATE THEREOF, TO HAVE EFFECT THROUGHOUT TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.