Sri Paramesh G Nayak vs The Union Of India And Others
Judges: R Devdas
05 April, 2019·2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had back pain and he was not normally given duty of sentry, since a sentry was required to stand for two hours with a machine gun. Further, it is submitted that since another Constable was not available for doing sent...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Zibunnissa W/O Late vs Smt Shakeela Begum W/O
Judges: K S Mudagal Regular
05 April, 2019·6) Whether the defendant proves that, Syed Ameer has agreed to sell the suit schedule property in her favour for Rs.3,10,000/- and accordingly received Rs.50,000/- as part consideration? 7) Whether the defendant proves that, she is continuing in possession of the suit schedule property unde...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Lakshmamma
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Regular
05 April, 2019·(By Smt. D.J.Rakshitha, Advocate for Sri. Lohitaswa Banakar, Advocate) AND: 1. Sri. Nataraj, Age: Major, Father’s Name not know to the Appellant R/at Kathriguppe Village, BSK 3rd Stage, Bengaluru-560085. 2. Smt. J.Vijayalakshmi, W/o. Sri. N.Nataraj, Age : 65 R/at M.No.66, …Appellant Kathriguppe Ea...
High Court Of Karnataka
Harish Kumar vs Chandrahasa Shetty
Judges: John Michael Cunha
05 April, 2019·ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is absent. Perused the records. 2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.04.2015 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. has been dismissed. 3. Learned cou...
High Court Of Karnataka
Onora Hospitality Pvt Ltd A Company And Others vs Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Department
Judges: John Michael Cunha
05 April, 2019·7. Refuting the above contentions, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent/complainant would however submit that Section 200 of the Act read with Rule 30 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 contemplate deposit of the TDS deducted within the prescribed time limit and failu...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri A S Satisha And Others vs Smt Jayamma D/O Ningapatna Javaregowda
Judges: K S Mudagal
05 April, 2019·1. SRI A.S.SATISHA S/O LATE A.SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 2. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE A.SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.333 8TH DIVISION, 33 WARD SWARNASANDRA, MANDYA CITY – 571 401 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GURURAJ KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.JAYAMMA D/O NINGAPATNA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri R Muniraju vs K S Krishnamurthy
Judges: Sreenivas Harish Kumar Regular
05 April, 2019·(By Smt. D.J.Rakshitha, Advocate for Sri. Lohitaswa Banakar, Advocate) AND: 1. K.S.Krishnamurthy, S/o. K.Srinivasa Murthy, Since dead by his LRs, a) Smt. Gowramma, Aged about 77 years, W/o. Late K.S.Krishna Murthy, R/at No.21/116, Near Rama Rao Layout, Banashankari III Stage, Bengaluru-560085. b) ...
High Court Of Karnataka
The State Of Karnataka
Judges: S G Pandit, Ravi Malimath
05 April, 2019·... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G KRISHNA MURTHY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI K.CHANDRAKANTH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU -560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K.G.ROAD BENGALURU -560 009. ...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Vijaya & Rao vs Mr Mohammed Ali And Others
Judges: B Veerappa
05 April, 2019·2. Mr.Chandra Babu, S/o.Late Satyanarayana Murthy, Aged about 56 years, 3. Mrs.Sangeetha, W/o.Late.T.S.Chandrakumar, Aged about 70 years, Both residing at No.183, Narayanapillai Street, Civil Station, Bengaluru-51. 4. Mr.Sameeulla, S/o. Late. Mohammed Jia Ullah, Aged about 44 years, R/at No.26, M...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt T Bhuvaneshwari vs The Karnataka State Financial Corporation And Others
Judges: John Michael Cunha, Ravi Malimath
05 April, 2019·C) OR ALTERNATIVELY, RE-HEAR THE WRIT APPEAL UPON RESTORING THE WRIT APPEAL TO ITS ORIGINAL FILE; D) PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEM IT FIT AND PROPER IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AND ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION WITH COSTS, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.