IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.520 OF 2015 (DEC/POS) BETWEEN:
1. SRI A.S.SATISHA S/O LATE A.SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 2. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE A.SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.333 8TH DIVISION, 33 WARD SWARNASANDRA, MANDYA CITY – 571 401 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GURURAJ KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT.JAYAMMA D/O NINGAPATNA JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O SRINIVASAPURA KASABA HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 404 ... RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PASSED IN R.A.NO.288/2010 DATED 15.07.2014 PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE MANDYA AND THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.164/2005 DATED 01.06.2010 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION) & CJM, MANDYA.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T Learned counsel for the appellants submits that appellants are not interested in proceedings with the matter.
As per the memo filed before this Court, sole respondent died on 19.02.2015. No steps are taken to bring her legal representatives on record. Therefore, the appeal already stood abated and disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE KG