M/S Tobacco Board Government vs State Of Karnataka Commercial Tax Department
Judges: H G Ramesh, John Michael Cunha
30 May, 2017·STATE OF KARNATAKA COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT SEHADRI BHAVAN, DIVAN ROAD, MYSURU REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VAT AUDIT-1 ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI T. K.VEDAMURTHY, AGA) THESE STRPs ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 65(1) OF THE KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT., 2003 AGAINST THE...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Subramani vs Dr G S Shivanna Reddy And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
30 May, 2017·1. Dr.G.S.SHIVANNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS ORTHOPAEDIST AND RETIRED ADMINISTRATIVE MEDICAL OFFICER NOW R/AT.DHARMAPURA HOBLI HIRIYUR TALUK-572 143 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 2. SRI.VENKATESH REDDY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS DISTRICT HEALTH OFFICER HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAK...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sathyanarayana S D vs Smt Jayamma W/O Late And Others
Judges: K S Mudagal R
30 May, 2017·1. Smt.Jayamma W/o Late Diwakara S.P Aged about 62 years, A.N.M, Government Hospital, Sagar, Shimoga District. 2. Smt.Chandrika W/o Lingappa Aged about 43 years, D/o Diwakara S.P 3. Suma D/o Diwakara S.P. Aged about 27 years, Sagar Town, Shimoga District. Respondents No.2 and 3 are R/at And C/O S...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Shivamma And Others vs Puttegowda And Others
Judges: Ashok B Hinchigeri
30 May, 2017·Appeal abated against appellant No.2) AND: 1. Puttegowda, S/o.Late Basavegowda, Major, Apphalli Village, Halebeedu Hobli, Belur Taluk, Hassan District. 2. Moorthy Gowda, S/o.Late Basavegowda, Major, Moale Village, Javagal Hobli, Arasikere Taluk, Hassan District. 3. Mahalingappa, S/o.Late Basavego...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Santhosh Theatre Sullia vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: H G Ramesh, John Michael Cunha
30 May, 2017·STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES IN KARNATAKA VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU-560 009. …RESPONDENT THESE STRPs ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 8(F) OF THE KARNATAKA ENTERTAINMENT TAX ACT, 1979 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.02.20...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Rathnamma vs Smt Gangamma And Others
Judges: Ashok B Hinchigeri
30 May, 2017·1. Smt.Gangamma, D/o.Late D.Shivaiah, Aged about 42 years. 2. Sri Manjunatha, S/o.Smt.Gangamma, Aged about 20 years. Both are residing at Kamaganahalli Village, Hosur Hobli, Gowribidanur Taluk, Chikkaballapur District. …Respondents This appeal is filed under Section 104 of CPC against...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Adilakshmi W/O Subramanya vs Ra Chooda
Judges: L Narayana Swamy
30 May, 2017·A VENU S/O CHANGALA NAIDU SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1 A) SMT.SAVITHRI W/O LATE A VENU AGED 60 YEARS 1 B) SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE A VENU AGED 35 YEARS 1 C) VIJAY S/O LATE A VENU AGED 32 YEARS 1D) SHEELA D/O LATE A VENU AGED 38 YEARS 1E) KAVITHA D/O LATE A VENU AGED 33 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT 89-E, 3RD MAIN ROAD, RAMA...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Komala
Judges: L Narayana Swamy
30 May, 2017·ADVOCATES) AND 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA, W/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. SMT. MANGAMMA, D/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 3. SRI. N. NARAYANA, S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 4. SRI. N. RAMESH, S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 5. SMT. N. LATHA, W/O KRISHN...
High Court Of Karnataka
Shri Ashwathappa And Others vs Smt Nandini W/O Mukund
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao, Jayant Patel
30 May, 2017·SMT. NANDINI W/O MUKUND AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT No.62, 7TH MAIN ROAD SHARADA COLONY BASAVESHWARA NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 079. (BY SRI SUNIL DUTT YADAV, ADVOCATE) …RESPONDENT THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.10.2015 PASSED IN OS No.1620/2014 ON TH...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Jayamma vs Kum Manjula Daughter Of Late
Judges: N K Sudhindrarao, Jayant Patel
30 May, 2017·…APPELLANT …RESPONDENT (BY SRI P MAHESHA, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURT ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S.No.61/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FILED UNDER SECTION 20(3...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.