M C Rudrappa vs The Deputy Commissioner Kolar District And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
28 March, 2017·2. THE KARNATAKA WELFARE SOCIETY CHICKBALLAPUR, KOLAR DISTRICT, (NOW CHICKBALLAPUR DISTRICT), REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. *AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER ORDER DATED 03.10.2016. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R1 SRI NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) ***** THIS WRIT PETIT...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt B Yeshashwini vs The Secretary Regional Transport Authority Mandya Division
Judges: S Sujatha
28 March, 2017·... Petitioner The Secretary Regional Transport Authority Mandya Division, Regional Transport Office, Mandya – 571 401. …Respondent (By Sri.Vijay Kumar A.Patil, AGA) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct responde...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Manickam Qss Colour And Others vs The Managing Director And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
28 March, 2017·2. MR. V.M.MANICKAM, S/O. LATE M. VERGHEESE, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.35, OLD NO.76/9 & 75/10, NOW BEARING CORPORATION NO.35/11, 2ND CROSS, BHARATHI LAYOUT, SUDDAGUNTEPALYA, BENGALURU-560 029. 3. SMT. P. VIJAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O. SRI V. PUSHPARAJ, NO.16, MERIN DOOR,...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Manickam And Others vs The Managing Director And Others
Judges: A S Bopanna
28 March, 2017·2. MR. V.M.MANICKAM, S/O. LATE M. VERGHEESE, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.35, OLD NO.76/9 & 75/10, NOW BEARING CORPORATION NO.35/11, 2ND CROSS, BHARATHI LAYOUT, SUDDAGUNTEPALYA, BENGALURU-560 029. 3. SMT.JANCY MANICKAM, W/O.SRI V.M.MANICKAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.35,...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri V Loganathan vs Karnataka State Transport Authority Ttmc Building And Others
Judges: S Sujatha
28 March, 2017·2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION K.H. ROAD, SHANTINAGAR, BANGALORE-27. BY IS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1 SRI HAREESH T. BHANDARY, ADV FOR R2) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAY...
High Court Of Karnataka
M/S Siddeshwara International vs State Of Karnataka Secretary To Governemnt And Others
Judges: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, P S Dinesh Kumar
28 March, 2017·1. STATE OF KARNATAKA SECRETARY TO GOVERNEMNT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT (MSME AND MINES) 106, 1ST FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU, KARNATAKA- 560 001 2. DEPARTMENT OF FOREST ENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HAVING ITS ...
High Court Of Karnataka
Hamumantaiah @ Adappa vs Deputy Commissioner Ramanagara District And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
28 March, 2017·... RESPONDENTS (By Smt.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 AUTHORITY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER'S REPRESENTATION EFFECTIV...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri Hombanna vs Deputy Commissioner Ramanagara District Ramanagara And Others
Judges: Ravi Malimath
28 March, 2017·ORDER The learned Government Pleader is directed to take notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner seeks for a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner, Ramanagara District to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 08.10.2015 effectively, for issui...
High Court Of Karnataka
Smt Savitha D W/O Sri Nagesh vs Sri N Gangadhar And Others
Judges: Aravind Kumar
28 March, 2017·1. Sri N.Gangadhar S/o Late Ningappa Aged about 56 years R/at Sanklipura village Siddapura Post Bhadravathi Taluk Shimoga District 2. Sri Nagesh S.J S/o Sri Jogi Gowda Aged about 41 years R/at No.21, I Floor 4th Cross, Eshwarinagar BSK III Stage, Bangalore – 560 085 Presently R/at A-1 Apartment I Fl...
High Court Of Karnataka
Sri M G Malleshappa And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others
Judges: G Narendar
28 March, 2017·3. This Court in W.P.No.5028/2017 has been pleased to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner therein for implementation in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka a...
High Court Of Karnataka
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.