Indra Pal And Others vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Siddharth
11 May, 2021·The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants, Indra Pal, Jugendra, Brajesh, Upendra @ Bhupendra and Chandra Prakash, in Case Crime No. 14 of 2021, under Sections- 147, 148, 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Vijay...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahipat Saroj (Short Term Bail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajeev Singh
11 May, 2021·Sri Indrajeet Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant has fairly stated that he does not want to press this bail application. The bail application is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 11.5.2021 Amit/-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shakeel Ahmad Khan ( In Person) vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·The case is taken up through Video Conferencing. This writ petition has been filed challenging impugned F.I.R. dated 23.03.2021 arising out of Case Crime No.0188 of 2021, under Sections 204, 228, 467 & 468 IPC registered against the petitioner in Police Station Kotwali City, District Raebareli. Afte...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashwani Kumar Pandey @ Chotu & ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the State and have gone through the contents of the impugned First Information Report. Petitioner(s) is entitled for the benefit of Section 41A Cr.P.C. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noor Ahmad & Anr. vs State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. for the opposite parties. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners No. 1 and 2 have entered into a wedlock out of their free will. They both are major. No criminal case has been lodged against them till date, however the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijai Naresh Tiwari vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and have gone through the contents of the impugned First Information Report. Petitioner is entitled for the benefit of Section 41A Cr.P.C. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence allegedly comm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohit Singh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the State and have gone through the contents of the impugned First Information Report. Petitioner(s) is entitled for the benefit of Section 41A Cr.P.C. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s) alleg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Kumar Balmiki @ Guddu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Alok Mathur
11 May, 2021·5. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail in this matter since 26.03.2021 and is not having any criminal antecedents and there is no apprehension that after being released on bail he may flee from the course of law or may otherwise misuse the liberty. 6. Learned A.G.A. however opposes...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nusrat Jamal @ Nusrat Jamal Anwar ... vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the State and have gone through the contents of the impugned First Information Report. Petitioner(s) is entitled for the benefit of Section 41A Cr.P.C. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Noorjahan Bano & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Manish Mathur
11 May, 2021·3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the State and have gone through the contents of the impugned First Information Report. Petitioner(s) is entitled for the benefit of Section 41A Cr.P.C. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State states that the offence(s)...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.