Brijesh Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
27 July, 2021·Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Undisputedly, against the order dated 20.02.2021, the petitioner has statutory r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harvir Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
27 July, 2021·Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Petitioner prays for time to deposit the license renewal fee for the excise year 2021-22. Upon written instructions received by Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner did not deposit the license fee ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tooltech Global Engg. Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Research Designs & Standards Org. ...
Judges: Rajan Roy, Ravi Nath Tilhari
27 July, 2021·In the impugned tender process the alternative or modified eligibility condition, which was inserted subsequently in the earlier tender, has not been included. After issuance of the fresh tender notice the petitioner raised certain queries to the opposite party no. 2 vide Annexure No. 45 regarding e...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaideep Singh & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home & ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the impugned false first information report lodging by the opposite party no.3 on 16.07.2021 at 21:20 hours, in F.I.R./Case Crime no.0228 of 2021, under Sections 147, 307, 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., Police Station Mak...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Sajjad @ Sajjad vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
27 July, 2021·Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, it cannot be said that no offence is made out against applicant and all the submissions made at the bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunita Nigam vs Addl.Prin.Secy. U.P. Handloom & ...
Judges: Irshad Ali
27 July, 2021·4. On perusal of the material brought on record, it has been transpired that no cause of action arose within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable in view of Full Bench Judgement in the case of Rajendra Kumar Mishra vs. Union of India & others r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surjeet Kumar vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home. Lko ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·Issue notice to complainant/opposite party No.4. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of impugned First Information Report dated 20.01.2021 lodged at F.I.R./Case Crime No.14 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC , P.S. Motiganj, District Gonda. Lear...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Constable Ashwani Yadav Pratap ... vs State Off U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
27 July, 2021·3. As per averments made in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of the writ petition, it is admitted fact that the petitioner and opposite party no.4 were having consensual relations with each other but due to some misunderstanding between them, the First information report was lodged by respondent no.4. It is f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Food Corporation Of ... vs Commissioner Of Commercial ...
Judges: Attau Rahman Masoodi
27 July, 2021·Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that a strong prima facie case in favour of the revisionist is itself evident from the fact that the first appellate authority as well as the Appellate Tribunal being convinced with the submission put forth have already stayed the deposit of the disp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shobha Ram & Anr. vs Judicial Magistrate Ist Class ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
27 July, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicants has further submitted that the complainant concealed the fact that issue in relation to the boundary was also decided in Regular Suit No.385 of 2017 vide judgment and order dated 19.09.2017 and after recording the statement under Sections 200 & 202 Cr.P.C., the imp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.