Kasif @ Kashif Ahmad vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Alok Mathur
09 February, 2021·5. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant was not present on the place where alleged incident took place. He is not named in the first information report and he was implicated in the case on the basis of CCTV footage. The applicant denies his presence in he s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anas vs State Of U.P. And Anopther
Judges: Samit Gopal
09 February, 2021·In the meantime, both the accused persons, namely, Anas and Noor Alam claimed juvenilety and an application dated 13.02.2017 was moved by them through their guardian/father Islam before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur with the prayer that they be declared juvenile. On the said application, poli...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akash vs State Of U.P. & Anoter
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
09 February, 2021·Learned counsel for Applicant has contended that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is contended that the radiological age of the prosecutrix is 18 years and there is no mark of injury suggesting forcible sexual assault in the medical report; there are material contradiction ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2f6e5c47584e41466f">[email protected]</a> Billu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
09 February, 2021·Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunita Devi And 5 Others vs Anil Tiwari And 2 Others
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
09 February, 2021·3. On the request of this Court Sri Arvind Kumar accepts notice on behalf of New India Insurance Company Ltd. 4. This appeal has been filed by the claimants being aggrieved of award dated 27.9.2019 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Additional District Judge, FTC-02, Allahabad. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Parvin And Others
Judges: Vivek Agarwal
09 February, 2021·3. Appellant's contention is that learned Claims Tribunal has failed to appreciate vital facts necessary for adjudication of the present case. It is submitted that, admittedly, accident took place on 19.07.2009, when deceased was travelling in Max Jeep bearing Registration No.U.P.-42T/4292, which wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vakeel Harijan And Another vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Suresh Kumar Gupta
09 February, 2021·In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A., and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail. Let the applicants Vakeel Harijan and Sajawal Harijan in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul @ Yogesh Nishad vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Suresh Kumar Gupta
09 February, 2021·In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Let the applicant Rahul @ Yogesh Nishad involved in Case Cr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rampat @ Nankoo Gupta @ Avnish vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
09 February, 2021·Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraj Dwivedi vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
09 February, 2021·Learned counsel for Applicant has contended that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. It is contended that the radiological age of the prosecutrixs is about 19 years; there is no mark of injury suggesting forcible sexual assault in the medical report; there is material contradicti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.