Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he does not indulge in any unlawful activity as provided in Gangsters Act and, therefore, no case is made out against the applicant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in the present case five have been shown in the gang chart against the applicant in which the applicant have been released on bail. He is in jail since 29.9.2020.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant but contended that if the applicant is enlarged on bail, he may misuse the liberty of bail.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A., and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Rahul @ Yogesh Nishad involved in Case Crime No. 4567 of 2021 under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Vrindawan, District Mathura be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C.
If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 9.2.2021 Md Faisal