M K Aggarwal Project Engineer Noida vs State Of U P Thru Principal Secy And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra Kashyap And Others vs State Of U P Thru Secy Medical Health And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vijay Swaroop Saxena vs Aligarh In Gramin Bank Thru Chairman And Others
Judges: Saral
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 22879 of 2008 Petitioner :- Vijay Swaroop Saxena Respondent :- Aligarh In Gramin Bank Thru Chairman And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.K. Srivastava,Archana Singh,Devesh Kumar Shukla,Rajesh Kumar,Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.B. Gupta,A/A0646,Amrish Sahai,R.B. Sa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Aibaran Singh Yadav vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishwanath Maurya vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Prakash Yadav vs State Of U P Thru Principal Secy And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. The matter is listed under the heading of 'Likely to be Infructuous'. The petitioner, by means of present writ petition, has prayed for following relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records of the case and to quash th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Radhey Shyam Dubey vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Navin Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Alok Mathur
20 December, 2021·Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. 2. It appears that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view thereof, present writ petition is consigned to records has having become infruct...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Phool Chand Gautam vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral
20 December, 2021·Case :- WRIT - A No. - 41284 of 2009 Petitioner :- Phool Chand Gautam Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.C. Pandey,R.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arvind Srivastava,K.Ajit,S.R. Singh Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. From perusal of record and prayer made in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Updesh Yadav vs Secondary Education Department Uttar Pradesh And Another
Judges: S Manju Rani Chauhan
20 December, 2021·This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct respondent no.2 i.e. the Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P. at Prayagraj to correct marks awarded to the petitioner in Class-XII examinations conducted by the Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, U.P. at Prayagraj in accorda...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.