Juvenile Accused Vikas Yadav ... vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Karunesh Singh Pawar
17 August, 2021·It is further submitted that the Juvenile Justice Board and also the appellate court while rejecting the bail application(s) overlooked the opinion of the district Probation Officer, Sitapur as also the true spirit and intent of the Legislature as provided under Section 12 of the Act which provides ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Furqan Ahsan vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Saroj Yadav
17 August, 2021·The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner- Mohd. Furqan Ahsan for the following reliefs: "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 21.07.2020 (Annexure No.1); the entire subsequent proceedings qua the petitioner/accused (U/s 40...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashif Quraishi And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Pritinker Diwaker, Manju Rani Chauhan
17 August, 2021·Main grievance of the petitioners in this petition is that Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(2) of UP Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 have casually been mentioned in the FIR and this is nothing but a highhandedness on the part of the police to harass the petitioners. On the previous...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Shanti Swaroop Krishi Inter ... vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
17 August, 2021·6. The aforesaid enactments are a complete code. The enactments are special legislations covering a specific field of law. 7. I see merit in the contention of Shri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners that the labour court exceeded its jurisdiction by entertaining the industri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashwani Kumar Gupta vs State Of U.P. And Anothor
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
17 August, 2021·Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail and has submitted that as per F.I.R. the applicant conspired with the other accused persons and permitted the name of co-accused to be entered in the house register. Considered the submission made by learned counsel of both the sides. There ap...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mayank Gangwar & Another vs State Of U.P. & Another
Judges: Mohd Faiz Khan
17 August, 2021·The instant petition has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the Charge sheet No.01 dated 18.02.2020 and summoning order passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow pertaining to the F.I.R. No.0513/2019, under Sections 307, 436 I.P.C., Police Station Indira Nagar,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Triveni Prasad Verma vs State Of U.P. Thru Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
17 August, 2021·The case set forth by the petitioner is that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2020 while working on the post of Deputy Collector. Prior to his retirement, a memorandum dated 21.11.2019, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition had been issued whereby t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anis @ Umesh Chandra @ Bagat vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Sanjay Kumar Pachori
17 August, 2021·Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the gang chart one case bearing case crime no.173 of 2020, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307, 302, IPC has been shown against the applicant and in the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pyarey Gautam & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Irshad Ali
17 August, 2021·5. Learned counsel for the applicants further submitted that case of the applicants stand on identical footing, hence, applicants are also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It is next argued that the applicants are neither a previous convict nor they have any previous criminal history prior...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashutosh Singh Pno No.-122690110 vs State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Home ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Dinesh Kumar Singh
17 August, 2021·5. We have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondents and gone through the record. 6. The claim petition was filed before the Tribunal, challenging punishment order dated 10th July, 2017, appellate or...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.