Mewa Kumar Tewari & Another vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
27 September, 2019·16. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a perusal of the impugned order would show that no consideration on the merits of the case as pleaded by the petitioners was done by respondent no.2. All of a sudden, after enumerating the facts as pleaded by both the parties, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babloo [Second Bail] vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
27 September, 2019·Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is in jail since 12.2.2019 in Case Crime No.137/2019, under Sections 3, 5 & 8 of Cow Slaughter and Animal Preservation Act, 1977, Police Station ? Kotwali Sadar, District ? Barabanki. He has further submitted that co-accused Sures...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay @ Sajje @ Kaushal vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
27 September, 2019·Learned counsel for the applicant by reading over the said portion of the F.I.R. wants to submit that the elopement of informant's daughter, the victim along with the Sanjay @ Sajje @ Kaushal is well known to the informant. Learned counsel for the applicant further drew attention towards the medico ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P.Thru ...
Judges: Chandra Dhari Singh
27 September, 2019·Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and, as per the instructions, has submitted that the impugned order has been passed after considering the entirety of the matter. Learned Standing Counsel has pointed out Annexure 4 i....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumari Iti Agarwal vs Sri Ganesh Pal And Others
Judges: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
27 September, 2019·(i) Sanjay Kumar Vs. Ashok Kumar and another, (2014) 5 SCC 330; (ii) Syed. Sadiq and others Vs. Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, (2014) 2 SCC 735; (iii) V. Mekala Vs. M. Malathi and another, (2014) 11 SCC 178; and (iv) Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles (Eleventh Amendment) Rule...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India Thru. Secy. Women & ... vs Mobeen Ahmad & Anr.
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Irshad Ali
27 September, 2019·Learned Tribunal, relying on the provisions of Rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (re-deployment of surplus staff) Rules, 1990, came to the conclusion that respondent No.1 cannot get less pay, than he was actually drawn before or till the period he was declared surplus. Paras 34 to 38 of the impug...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Motilal Yadav vs State Of U.P.Thru. Addl.Chief ...
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, Irshad Ali
27 September, 2019·"This application is preferred to restrain the selected incumbents whose merit has been assessed by the respondent nos.4,5 & 6. In the instant petition for writ the eligibility of respondent nos. 4,5 & 6 to become Members of Secretary Education Services Selection Board is questioned. However, there ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogendra @ Teetu vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ram Krishna Gautam
27 September, 2019·7. After hearing learned Additional District Government Counsel and learned counsel for the defence, the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence made therein, written as above, was passed. 8. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Ravi Prakash, learned AGA for t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pintu @ Mukesh Yadav [Second Bail] vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
27 September, 2019·Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is in jail since 29.1.2018 in Case Crime No.371 of 2017 under Sections 147, 148, 149 & 302 IPC, Police Station P.G.I., District Lucknow. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that co-accused Shravan Yadav alias Shravan, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sahbaj Ahmad @ Tipu vs State Of U.P. & Anr.
Judges: Pankaj Bhatia
27 September, 2019·Counsel for the appellant has argued that there are no averments in the entire case so as to attract the implication of appellant under Section 306 I.P.C. He has drawn my attention towards the F.I.R. as well as the statement of Sri Kishori, a bare perusal of which prima facie does not implicate the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.