Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Babloo [Second Bail] vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned AGA has filed counter affidavit, the same is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is in jail since 12.2.2019 in Case Crime No.137/2019, under Sections 3, 5 & 8 of Cow Slaughter and Animal Preservation Act, 1977, Police Station ? Kotwali Sadar, District ? Barabanki. He has further submitted that co-accused Suresh Kumar, Arjun and Ramji have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 2.7.2019 passed in Bail No.5920 of 2019, which has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the bail application. Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that no incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the applicant, however some incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the co-accused, who have been granted bail. He, therefore, prays that the present applicant may be enlarged on bail.
Learned AGA has not disputed the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the applicant.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let applicant - Babloo be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 RBS/-
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Babloo [Second Bail] vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • Rajesh Singh Chauhan