Medi Pasi vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
30 May, 2019·Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J. Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of revisionist-accused. Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned brief holder for the State is present. A report has been r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamshed And Others vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
30 May, 2019·List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. is present. In compliance of the court's order dated 19.4.2019, office has submitted its report dated 28.5.2019 stating therein that the CJM Muzaffar Nagar has sent his comp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar vs State Of U P
Judges: Virendra Kumar Srivastava
30 May, 2019·Ref:Criminal Misc. Recall Application No. 2 of 2019. Heard Ms. Fatima Khatoon, learned counsel for the revisionist-applicant and learned AGA for the State. This recall application has been moved for recalling of the order dated 29.4.2019, whereby the non-bailable warrant has been issued against the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satish vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
30 May, 2019·List revised. Heard Sri Jitendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned brief holder for the State. The Criminal Revision has been preferred against the judgement and order dated 16.9.1999 passed by VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Cr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jai Prakash And Another vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Rahul Chaturvedi
30 May, 2019·I have perused the statement of the victim as well as Jai Prakash recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. whereby the entire tirade of allegation is against Mohan Shyam and in the statement of the victim recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. she has levelled the allegation on Mohan Shyam and Jai Prakash. The complicity of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co Ltd & Others vs Prahlad Kumar Keserwani And Others & Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
30 May, 2019·Counsel for Respondent :- Ram Singh 2. Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1916 of 2001 Appellant :- Prahlad Kumar Kesarwani And Others Respondent :- Jora Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Dinesh Chandra Gupta, Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :-N.K.Srivastva Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. 1. H...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Rama Nand And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
30 May, 2019·3. Delay in filing substitution application is explained satisfactorily. It is hereby condoned. The application is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 30.5.2019 AK Court No. - 34 Application No. 27624 of 2015 IN Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 412 of 1997 Appellant :- National Insurance Co. Ltd...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Rama Nand And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
30 May, 2019·3. Delay in filing substitution application is explained satisfactorily. It is hereby condoned. The application is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 30.5.2019 AK Court No. - 34 Application No. 27636 of 2015 IN Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 413 of 1997 Appellant :- National Insurance Co. Ltd...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prahlad Kumar Kesarwani And Others vs Jora Singh And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
30 May, 2019·2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing recall application. 2. Delay in filing recall application is explained satisfactorily. It is hereby condoned. The application is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 30.5.2019 AK Court No. - 34 Application No. 375789 of 2013 IN Case :- F...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shakuntala Devi And Ors vs Abdul Shahid And Ors
Judges: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
30 May, 2019·6. In Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1964 SC 1372 the Court said: “A review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected, but lies only for patent error.” 7. In Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma Vs. Aribam Pishak Sharma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.