Mukul Kumar And Others vs Deputy Superintendent Of Police, ...
Judges: Munishwar Nath Bhandari, Vikas Kunvar Srivastav
30 July, 2019·The prayer is to quash the first information report dated 05.02.1998 registered with P.S.- Civil Lines, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh as crime case no. 47 of 1998 titled as Ritcha Kumar vs. Mukul Kumar and Ors. It is also to quash the proceedings initiated before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jabalpur. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arya Pratinidhi Sabha Thru Pres. ... vs State Of U.P Thru Secy ...
Judges: Vivek Chaudhary
30 July, 2019·4. So far as impugned orders dated 09.11.2016, 16.01.2017and 30.03.2017 are concerned, counsels for both the parties agree that the aforesaid order may be set aside. However, the issue as to whether Sri Devendra Pal Verma is entitled to hold any post in the society or not be left to be decided after...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Singh Pawar vs U.O.I. Thru. Home . Secy. Ministry ...
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi, Virendra Kumar Ii
30 July, 2019·2. The review petition has been filed with delay. Since on objection has been filed by the opposite parties, considering the grounds taken in the application for condonation of delay, we feel appropriate to condone the delay and decide the review petition on merit. 3. The order is accordingly passed...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kedar vs Radha Krishna Mahavidyalaya And 2 ...
Judges: Manoj Kumar Gupta
30 July, 2019·"(i) matrimonial relief, including nullity of marriage, judicial separation, divorce, restitution of conjugal rights, or declaration as to the validity of a marriage or as to the matrimonial status of any person; (ii) the property of the spouses or of either of them; (ii) declaration as to the legit...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Parmar @ Bunty Raja And 2 ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Ram Krishna Gautam
30 July, 2019·9. No appeal, by the State against judgement of acquittal for offence, under Section 413 IPC, is there. 10. First Information Report, Exhibit Ka-1, was formally proved by PW-1, Balram Pachauri and it has specifically been lodged against unknown thieves, because this witness was not present at his ho...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Awadhesh Kumar Yadava vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Judges: Suneet Kumar
30 July, 2019·The scope of judicial review is confined to decision making process and not the decision. It is not the case of the petitioner that no opportunity of hearing was given during the disciplinary proceedings, nor it is his case that the reply or explanation furnished by him was not considered. The scope...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kedar vs Radha Krishna Mahavidyalaya And 2 ...
Judges: Manoj Kumar Gupta
30 July, 2019·No doubt, having regard to the pleadings of the parties and the relief sought, one of the main issues to be decided by the trial court is whether defendant No.3 is son of Bhairam or no. In case it is held that he is son of Bhairam, the basis of the plaint for cancellation of the sale deed would stan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mithun Kumar Dixit vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Karunesh Singh Pawar
30 July, 2019·Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and for the period for which he is in jail, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. Let the applicant Mithun Kumar Dixit invol...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandani Bano & Anr. vs Saif Alam
Judges: Anil Kumar, Saurabh Lavania
30 July, 2019·From the perusal of the record, the position which emerges out is to the effect that the respondent-applicant filed a Regular Suit No. 677 of 2014 under Section 281 of the Muslim Law for the restitution of conjugal rights in the Family Court, District- Faizabad. To the aforesaid, the respondent has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kiran Gupta vs Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba, Narendra Kumar Johari
30 July, 2019·(ii)............ (iii)........... (iv)..........." 2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms. Aprajita Bansal, Advocate for respondents no.1, 2 and 3 and Shri Raj Baksh Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5/State. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.