Suresh vs State Of U P Thru Secy And Others
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
23 January, 2019·The present petition is directed against the orders dated 21.1.2012 and 8.8.2012 passed by the Courts below in a proceeding under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. arising out of Original Suit No. 1592 of 1987 (Dhirendra & others vs. Suresh & others). The petitioner is defendant no. 1 in the said suit. By mean...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tara Chand And Others vs Smt Sunita Mittal And Others
Judges: Surya Prakash Kesarwani
23 January, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42861 of 2008 Petitioner :- Tara Chand And Others Respondent :- Smt. Sunita Mittal And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- SC Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. List revised. Case called out. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Munnu @ Munnu Lal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vikram Nath
23 January, 2019·Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. Despite time having been granted since 2.11.2018, no counter affidavit has been filed by the State-respondents till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation relating to the irregularity, committed in the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishamvar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
23 January, 2019·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner is assailing the validity of order impugned dated 11.9.2012 passed by the third respondent, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Rampur, whereby...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Bank Of India vs Shyam Narayan Pandey And Others
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
23 January, 2019·The said suit has been filed by the respondent no.1 for the relief of declaration and damages against two defendants namely the petitioner-bank and the respondent no.2, through its partner i.e. M/s United Automobiles Lucknow road. As per the plaint averments, the plaintiff had contended that he had ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Pal Singh vs Shashipal Singh
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
23 January, 2019·On a pointed query made by the Court, as to how the relief claimed in the aforesaid suit are barred by Section 331 of the Act' 1950, no plausible answer could be given by the learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the petitioner indicates ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Parvez Hussain vs Union Of India Thru Secy. And 2 ...
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya, Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
23 January, 2019·8. In order to appreciate the rival contentions of the parties we may refer to the Brochure containing guidelines for selection of Regular LPG Distributors which were made applicable to all locations advertised/re-advertised after 01.04.2011. 9. The eligibility criteria for individual applicants has...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogendra Prasad Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Alok Mathur
23 January, 2019·6. The Tribunal after dealing with all the contentions raised by the petitioner, in paragraph 14 of judgement held as under :- "14. A perusal of records shows that evidence adduced by the petitioner has been considered by the respondents. We also find that the procedure of enquiry as laid down in UP...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basheer Ahmad Beg 540(S/B)2006 vs Central Administrative Tribunal ...
Judges: Shabihul Hasnain, Alok Mathur
23 January, 2019·4. It is next submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he retired from service on 28/02/2004 after attaining the age of superannuation i.e 60 years. Prior to his retirement the petitioner had submitted all the necessary documents along with joint photograph in triplicate for the purpose of pension...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Naresh Tiwari vs State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Deptt.Of ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
23 January, 2019·Pension to civil employees of the Government and the defence personnel as administered in India appear to be a compensation for service rendered in the past. From the discussion three things emerge: (i) that pension is neither a bounty nor a matter of grace depending upon the sweet will of the emplo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.