Pappu vs State Of U P
Judges: Vivek Kumar Singh
27 February, 2019·Heard Sri Ravi Shankar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Usha Asthana, learned A.G.A. for the State. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that three cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
V Singh vs D D C
Judges: Salil Kumar Rai
27 February, 2019·Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- V.Singh,H.S. Nigam,M.A. Haseem,Rishi Ram,S.C.,S.S. Nigam Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Heard Sri Anil Sharma, counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Margret Roberts, Advocate holding brief of Sri S.S. Nigam, counsel for respondent no. 6. Durin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parvindra Kumar And Another vs D D C And Ors
Judges: Salil Kumar Rai
27 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - B No. - 7191 of 1982 Petitioner :- Parvindra Kumar And Another Respondent :- D.D.C. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- B.D.Mandhyan,Archit Mandhyan,Satish Mandhyan,Vinod Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Arjun Singhal Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. The list has been revised. No one app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S L A Infraventures Pvt Ltd vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 February, 2019·Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Namit Srivastava,Parul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Jai Singh Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Sri Kunal Ravi Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Namit Srivastava, Advocate, for petitioner and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Jai Prakash Associates Ltd vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3367 of 2019 Petitioner :- M/S Jai Prakash Associates Ltd Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Wasim Masood Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J. 1. Called in revise. None appeared ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Kumar Rai And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal
27 February, 2019·Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sudhanshu Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 National Highway Authority. By means of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is praying for quashment of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd Hasan And Others vs Ddc And Others
Judges: Salil Kumar Rai
27 February, 2019·Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. During the consolidation proceedings held in the village, the petitioners filed objections under Section 9-A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as, 'Act, 1953') against the entries in t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Ram And Others vs D D C And Others
Judges: Salil Kumar Rai
27 February, 2019·Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2207 of 1983 Petitioner :- Sri Ram And Others Respondent :- D.D.C. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.S.N.Tripathi,Chandra Prakash Misra Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,P.S.Pandey,Pradeep Shankar Pandey Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Shri H.S.N.Tripathi, counsel for the petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahadevi Sharma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
27 February, 2019·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the allotment of the fair price shop in question, which fell vacant due to death of husband of the petitioner on compassionate ground as there is no any source of income to th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gore Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal
27 February, 2019·1. Called in revise. None appeared for petitioners to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, we ourselves have perused the record. 2. It is evident from record that a work contract was executed on 29.05.2006 and was completed in the same ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.