Vimal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Prakash Padia
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the respondent Nos.3 to 6. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Vaibhav Shakti Infra And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha
20 December, 2019·Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the amendment application is allowed since it relate to amending only the prayer clause of the writ petition. In view of the above the amendment application is allowed. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out necessary amendm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jeenat Fatima @ Jaswinder Kaur And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. (Oral) 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. In pursuance to the order dated 29.11.2019, the petitioner no.2 has deposited Rs.1 lakh in favour of petitioner no.1. A copy of the relevant extract of the pass book issued by the Post Master, Allah...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arvind Kumar Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
20 December, 2019·Challenge in the writ petition is to an order dated 05.01.2013, whereby the Sub Divisional Magistrate, respondent no.3 has granted/ approved, suo moto, a plantation lease. On 18.12.2019, the following order had been passed- "Vide order dated 11.12.2019 learned Standing Counsel had been ordered to ob...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
C/M D R R Intermediate And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Rajiv Joshi
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuing a writ of mandamus comma...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar Dixit Alias Vinod Kumar Sharma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
20 December, 2019·The petitioner has preferred this writ petition making the following prayers:- "I) Issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondents concerned to transfer the owner ship of the residential quarter no.A-44 Lalit Park Modi Puram Meerut expeditiously within a stipulated pe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tathagat Pragaya vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: S Sangeeta Chandra
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in pursuance to the order dated 25.11.2019, the requisite amount of Rs.2 lakhs has been deposited in a fixed deposit in the name of petitioner no.1. 2. A joint affidavit has also been prepared which has been f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Sri Prem Shankar Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition so as to claim compensation of the land on which 'Pakka Nala' has been constructed by the respo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pankaj Mithal
20 December, 2019·Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Sri Arvind Prabodh Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. The dispute raised in this writ petition is regarding House No.69 Singadiya in District Gorakhpur. The petitioner alleges that the aforesaid hou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amanat Ali vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
20 December, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42173 of 2019 Petitioner :- Amanat Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. This is a recovery matter. No recovery certificate has been annexed. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.