Rama Food And Allied Industries Pvt Limited Thru Ram Gopal vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. The present revision has been filed by the assessee against the order of Trade Tax Tribunal, Ghaziabad, dated 9.11.2005 in the second appeal no. 317 of 2002, for A.Y. 1998-99 (Central). By that order, the Tribunal has partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Markwell Paper Plast Pvt Ltd vs The Commissioner Trade Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 269 of 2007 Revisionist :- M/S Markwell Paper Plast Pvt. Ltd. Opposite Party :- The Commissioner Trade Tax U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Revisionist :- Piyush Agrawal,Bharat Ji Agarwal,Pooja Talwar Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Mohan Mishra vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Vikram Nath
26 August, 2019·Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 1 of 2019 Heard Sri Virendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant. No one is present on behalf of respondents, although the case has been taken up in the revised call. This is an application to condone the delay of 57 days in filing sp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar Dwivedi And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: Abhinava Upadhya
26 August, 2019·Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Supplementary affidavit filed today, is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri V.K.Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6, Sri Atma Prakash Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 and Sri Chandan S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Vikram Nath
26 August, 2019·Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1 of 2019. There is a delay of 44 days in filing the appeal. This application has been filed to condone the delay. Cause shown for the delay has been satisfactorily explained. There is no objection from the side of the respondents. Delay condonat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Liyakat Ali vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: S Sunita Agarwal
26 August, 2019·Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Heard Sri Vikas Budhwar learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jagannath Maurya learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The petitioner is an employee of the U.P. State Employees Welfare Corporation and has been sent to another corporation namely U.P. Rajya Khad Ew...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brahma Nand vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
26 August, 2019·Following orders were passed in the matter on 25.7.2019:- "Learned Standing Counsel has obtained instructions in the matter, according to which petitioner has been declared medically unfit as he has been found suffering from Vertigo. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon Annexure-5...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pankaj Kumar vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ashwani Kumar Mishra
26 August, 2019·Order of suspension dated 7th June, 2019 is assailed in this petition, whereby petitioner has been placed under suspension on the charge that he had demanded bribe of Rs.53,000/- and that by misrepresenting facts the petitioner succeeded in availing illegal benefits. The writ petition was ent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Mohan Grain Agency vs Commissioner Commercial Tax
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·2. Present revision has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Trade Tax Tribunal, Gorakhpur dated 29.7.2008 in Second Appeal No.250 of 2004 for the A.Y. 2000-01 (Central). By that order the tribunal has rejected the appeal filed by the assessee and confirmed the first appeal order and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Arvind Kumar Mishra vs M B Suresh And Another
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·3. For the purposes of the present application, heavy reliance has been placed on clause 26 of the said work order. It reads as below: "All disputes and differences of any kind whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the contract, whether during the progress of the work or after its completi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.