Jagan @ Nanga vs The State Of U.P
Judges: Rajendra Kumar Iv
27 August, 2019·It appears that either cause of action or any interest to the revisionist no more survives or by efflux of time, revisionist lost her interest in the matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and probably for this reasons, none is interested to have decided this matter on merit and that is why c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Karan Veer Singh vs University Of Lucknow
Judges: Rakesh Srivastava
27 August, 2019·Shri Abhishek Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Shri Vidhu Bhushan Kalia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that by passage of time this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 27....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Yadav @ Prem Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajeev Singh
27 August, 2019·After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to surrender and move bail application, before the court concerned and suitable...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Manoj Kumar vs R.C.Awasthi,Registrar,Dr.Ram ...
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh
27 August, 2019·3. Pursuant to the notice issued in the present contempt petition, Sri H.K. Bhatt, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel has tendered an affidavit of Mr.R.C.Awasthi, District Social Welfare Officer, Ambedkar Nagar which is taken on record. Along with the aforesaid affidavit of compliance, a copy of o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Dutt Mishra vs Debts Recovery Tribunal Lucknow ...
Judges: Sangeeta Chandra
27 August, 2019·(3) From perusal of the rejoinder affidavit it appears that the same has been filed without service upon Shri Vinay Shanker. (4) Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank has pointed out Paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit wherein a reference has been made to three decisions of the Supreme Court name...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Kumar Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Secy. ...
Judges: Abdul Moin
27 August, 2019·"For these reasons, we have come to the conclusion that the view of the learned Single Judge in Sanjay Singh's case (supra) cannot be upheld as laying down the correct position in law. The view of the learned Single Judge shall stand, accordingly, overruled. The judgment in Pradeep Kumar (supra) is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Markwell Paper Plast Pvt Ltd vs The Commissioner Trade Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·(2). Whether even otherwise, any addition could have been made on the basis of such photo-copy invoices, in absence of any other evidence to establish performance of such transaction? 2. Accordingly, the matter has been proceeded. 3. The present revision has been filed by the assessee against the or...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sehkari Avas Nirman Evam Vitta Nigam Limited And Another vs Rajeev Chandra Pathak And Others
Judges: Vikram Nath
26 August, 2019·Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Varun Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Hanuman Prasad Dube, learned counsel representing respondent no. 1, Sri A....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Neoli Sugar Factory vs The Commissioner Commercial Tax U P Lucknow
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 975 of 2008 Revisionist :- M/S Neoli Sugar Factory Opposite Party :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax U.P. Lucknow Counsel for Revisionist :- N.R. Kumar,Vishwjeet Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. Re C.M. Correction Application...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner Trade Tax U P Lucknow vs S/S General Manager Telecom Department
Judges: Saumitra Dayal Singh
26 August, 2019·Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri B.K. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant-revenue and Sri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for the opposite party-assessee. 2. The present revision has been filed by the revenue against the order of the Trade Tax Tribunal, Muzaffar Nagar dated 25.11.200...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.