Kaushal Singhal vs District Supply Officer And Another
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Heard Sri Dhiraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Harish Chandra Dubey, learned Standing Counsel. The petitioner is fair price shop agent of Kasba Deoband, District Saharanpur. It appears that the licence of the petitioner has been suspended by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sunder Lal vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the District Magistrate, District Rampur to take appropriate action to open the public w...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jyoti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 April, 2019·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14652 of 2019 Petitioner :- Jyoti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Sri Pushpendra Singh Lodhi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 4 i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharmveer vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
26 April, 2019·Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard Sri Subhash Gosain, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1. No one appears for respondents no. 2 & 3 though notices have been accepted by Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi. The petitioner i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mithlesh Kumar Chaudhary And Another vs Northern Railway Primary Co-Operative Bank Limited And Another
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
26 April, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct the title of the respondents today itself. Heard Sri S.C. Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for respondents no. 1 & 2. The facts of the case are that one Mukesh Kumar is stated to have taken loan from the respondent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Payal Chaudhary And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 April, 2019·The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra Vaishy vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel
26 April, 2019·Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to delete the prayer No.1 of the writ petition. The leave is granted. Necessary correction in the relief clause be carried out during the course of the day. It is urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that against the order of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naresh Nishad @ Ramnaresh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
26 April, 2019·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to directing respondent no. 3/S.D.M. to decide the case No. 03778/2018 (Computer No. T201805440303778), case No. 01652/2018 (Comp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neelam And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 April, 2019·The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Zenab Gulzar And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Saral Srivastava
26 April, 2019·The petitioners claim that they are adults and living together out of their own freewill. It is stated that for the said reason, the private respondent and his other family members have got annoyed and there is serious danger to the lives of the petitioners as they are being threatened and harassed....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.