Shubham Shukla And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy Home ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Rajnish Kumar
31 May, 2018·Shri Jain will produce his report on the next date of listing. List this case on 28.05.2018, on which date, the petitioner no.1 as also the respondent no.4 shall be present before the Court. Let certified copy of this order be furnished today itself to Shri Shishir Jain and learned Additional Govern...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satendra Singh Shekhawat And ... vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Judges: Ramesh Sinha, Dinesh Kumar Singh I
31 May, 2018·Heard Sri Shantanu Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri N.K.Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the impugned FIR as well as material brought on record. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash the FIR dated 15.52018, registered as case crime ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dayashanker vs U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Thru. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
31 May, 2018·Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel has filed his Vakatanama on behalf of opposite party Nos.1, 2 & 3, the same is taken on record. Let the counter affidavit be filed by the opposite parties within a period of three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week thereafter. List t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dharam Raj Pandey And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
31 May, 2018·Notice on behalf of opposite party No.1 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel, whereas notices on behalf of opposite party Nos.2 to 5 have been accepted by Sri Anuj Kudesia, learned counsel. Let the counter affidavit be filed by the opposite parties within a period of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Smt. Zahida & Othrs
Judges: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
31 May, 2018·15. By the above process, the burden of proof may ordinarily be cast on the defendants in a motor accident claim petition to prove that motor vehicle was being driven with reasonable care or that there is equal negligence on the part of driver of another vehicle. 16. The Apex Court in the case of Pa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanti Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
31 May, 2018·Issue notice to opposite party No.5 returnable at an early date, for which, necessary steps be taken within a week. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the inaction on the part of the opposite parties whereby the petitioner has not been paid salary with effect from July, 2015...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
C/M Kissan Vidya Sabha Shamli And ... vs State Of U.P. & 4 Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
31 May, 2018·"17. Having given our thoughtful consideration in the matter and upon considering the language of Section 25(2) and 25(3) of the Act and upon a conjoint reading of Section 25(2) and 25(3) of the Act, it is apparently clear that the Registrar has the power and jurisdiction to call a meeting for the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rameshwari Devi vs Dr. R.D. Sharma& Others
Judges: Siddharth
31 May, 2018·Nothing in this sub- section shall affect the provisions of Section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872). Emphasis has been given to sub section (3) of Section 16 which provides that in case where the position of a person as such that he is in a position to dominate the will of another, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Prasad Dubey vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. ...
Judges: Vivek Chaudhary
31 May, 2018·Learned counsel for petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court by impleading sufficient number of members of the Institution. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is consigned to records as withdrawn. Order Date :- 31.5.2018 Rajneesh DR-PS) (Vivek ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Janak Maurya And Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic ...
Judges: Rajesh Singh Chauhan
31 May, 2018·. . . . . . . . . .Court No. - 23 (C.M.Application No.63739 of 2018) In Re:- Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 11375 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Janak Maurya And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.