Nirmala vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 May, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anurag Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondents. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to respondent no.1 to take act...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ashare Prajapati vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 May, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20478 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Ashare Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mool Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. After the matter has been heard at some length and the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Ashare Prajapati vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 May, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20491 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Ashare Prajapati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mool Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. After the matter has been heard at some length and the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
30 May, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20483 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Agarawal Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitione...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwati vs Collector And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 May, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. Shri T.M. Khan appears for Gaon Sabha. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to private respondent. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to respondent no...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Sharma vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
30 May, 2018·The entitlement to recover dues at the instance of the petitioner in terms of the agreement became subject matter of Writ C No.24415 of 2002 that was dismissed on 18.05.2016 by the following judgment : “1. Heard Sri H.P. Dubey, Advocate holding brief of Sri J.P. Pandey, learned counsel f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Anshu Yadav And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
30 May, 2018·The petitioners claim to have attained the age of majority. They claim to have got married. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the petitioners are interested in getting their marriage registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, District-Sambhal. However, in view of the th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Arshi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Ajay Bhanot
30 May, 2018·The petitioners claim to have attained the age of majority. They claim to have got married. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the petitioners are interested in getting their marriage registered before the Marriage Registration Officer, District-Bijnor. However, in view of the thr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kedar Singh vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
30 May, 2018·Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Pankaj Rai, learned Addl. Chief Standing counsel. Shri Ashish Kumar Srivastava appears for Gaon Sabha. The petitioner is before this Court for a direction to second respondent to decide Revision No.28 of 2011 (Keda...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Salig Ram Gupta vs Commissioner & Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
30 May, 2018·Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. The petitioner bought the property in question on 13.3.2003 and got it registered on the same date. The total area of the plot in question was 64.27 sq.m. Out of the total area petitioner paid stamp on 8.83 sq.m. at the rate which was applicable to commercial ar...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.