Amar Singh vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
27 February, 2018·This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been moved for seeking bail in Complaint Case No. 554 of 2016 under Section 302 I.P.C., P.S. Bidhnoo, District Kanpur Nagar. The facts of the case are that a complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. was moved by Smt. Anusuiya, grand-daughter of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mukesh vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
27 February, 2018·This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been moved for seeking bail in Case Crime No. 350 of 2017 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 504 and 506 I.P.C. & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Bah, District Agra. According to F.I.R., the prosecution case is that on 19.9.2017 at 5.30 p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajveer And Others vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dilip Gupta
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. The petitioners claim 64.70% additional compensation in terms of a Government Order dated 29 August 2014 and the decision taken by Yamuna Expressways Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'Development Authority) o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prempal Singh vs State Of U P
Judges: Dinesh Kumar Singh I
27 February, 2018·As per FIR, the prosecution's case is that the dead body of the deceased was found lying on road side on 8.8.2017 regarding which Chaukidar Kanhaiya Lal gave information to police. Subsequently the father of the deceased had made an FIR that her daughter had vanished from house on 31.7.2017 all of a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Bahadur Singh And Another vs District Magistrate
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This writ petition is misconceived as it seeks execution of a decree passed by the Collector under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. It is not disputed that provisions of Code of Civil Procedure are applicable to the in exe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anjali Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Sunita Devi Alias Savitri vs State Of U P And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7969 of 2018 Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita Devi Alias Savitri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for State of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subodh Kumar Tyagi And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Dilip
27 February, 2018·The principal prayer made in the writ petition reads thus: "(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and direct the respondent authority to verify the electoral roll of the ward no. 49 and correct the electoral list of the ward no. 49." The petitioner had filed a wri...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Arti And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. It is stated that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have got married with each other and their marriage has also been registered on 21.12.2017. However, it is stated that the respondents are not allowing them to stay together. Learned counsel by look...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Suman And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. It is stated that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have got married with each other and their marriage has also been registered on 1.12.2017. However, it is stated that the respondents are not allowing them to stay together. Learned counsel by looki...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.