Ram Bharose Tiwari vs State Of U P Through Secretary Home Affairs Govt Of U P Lucknow And Another
Judges: Ram Surat Ram
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7726 of 2018 Petitioner :- Ram Bharose Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home Affairs Govt. Of U.P. Lucknow And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Usha Srivastava,Lal Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard coun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pawan Kumar vs Additional Commisioner Gorakhpur And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Heard Sri Arun Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel. This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.1 / Addl. Commissioner, Gorakhpur Mandal, Gorakhpur...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gyan Singh vs State Of U P Through Principal Secretary
Judges: Krishna Murari
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents Nos. 1, 2 & 3, and Shri Gaurav Kumar Chand holding brief of Shri K.K. Chand appearing for respondent No. 4 are present. By this writ petition, the petitioner ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Harsu Devi vs State Of U P Lucknow And Others
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no. 2 to conclude the proceedings of Case No.367/2017 (Harsu Devi vs. Ramchandra), under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue, within a stipulated period. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rohit Shukla vs State Of U P Through Home Secretary
Judges: Ram Surat Ram Maurya
27 February, 2018·Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7732 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rohit Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Home Secretary, U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dan Bahadur Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for State...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Punjab National Bank vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The sole relief pressed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing of this petition is that the District Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar should take a decision on the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Punjab National Bank vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The sole relief pressed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing of this petition is that the District Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar should take a decision on the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Punjab National Bank vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Krishna Murari
27 February, 2018·Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. The sole relief pressed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing of this petition is that the District Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar should take a decision on the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Nidhi Tomar @ Gd Gaigonglu Rongmei And Another vs State Of U P And Others
Judges: Siddhartha Varma
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life. It is stated that ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyamveer Singh And Others vs The Of Up Through The Secretary
Judges: Pankaj Naqvi
27 February, 2018·Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel. It is urged that appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to conclude the proceedings of Revision No.54/2007, under Section 333 of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, within a stipulated period. Learned standing counsel ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.