Sri Ashok Kumar Jauhari vs Bar Council Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Bharati Sapru, Pradeep Kumar Baghel
23 December, 2016·Sri Ashutosh Dwivedi is filing his appearance on behalf of Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. He may obtain instruction as to why demand is being made by the petitioner despite a provision in the rule that no fee is to be charged in a transfer case. Put up this case for admission on 24th January, 2017. O...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Gulshan Kaur Bedi And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home And ...
Judges: Ajai Lamba, Vijay Laxmi
22 December, 2016·21. In Manish Ratan's case (supra), it appears that father-in-law of appellant No.1 lodged a complaint with police station Jabalpur alleging that the appellants have been ill-treating his daughter and they demanded dowry. Evidently, First Information Report was not lodged in Jabalpur. 22. Meena, the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kalika Prasad & 3 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy., ...
Judges: Anil Kumar
21 December, 2016·It is further submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that after receipt of the notice, petitioners have deposited the rent as required to be deposited by them while holding the land in question in the capacity of Asami Patta Holder/Class-3. On behalf of the petitioners, it is also submitted th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India And 3 Others vs Mohd. Naeem And Another
Judges: Dilip Gupta, Abhai Kumar
21 December, 2016·The matter requires consideration. Issue notice to respondent no.1 by registered post. Steps may be taken within a week. The respondents may file their counter affidavits in four weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. List this petition on 15 February 2017. Til...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subodh Pathak And Another vs State Of U.P.And Another
Judges: Om Prakash Vii
21 December, 2016·Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA appearing for the State. Learned counsel for the applicant referred to annexure no. SA-1 annexed along with the supplementary affidavit and argued that no injury report is available in the record of the complaint case. Contradictory statem...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S H.K. Consumer Cooperative ... vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: Pramod Kumar Srivastava
20 December, 2016·4. In this particular case, the petitioner had been approaching the courts for about three years from 2010 to 2013 and must have knowledge by that time that he should have preferred appeal, instead of approaching courts of wrong jurisdiction, because during this period his case and review applicatio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahboob & Ors. vs State Of U.P. Thur. Secy. Home ...
Judges: Anil Kumar Srivastava Ii
20 December, 2016·"At the stage of cognizance and summoning the Magistrate is required to apply his judicial mind only with a view to take cognizance of the offence, or in other words, to find out whether prima facie case has been made out for summoning the accused persons. At this stage, the Magistrate is not requir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azad Hind Fauj, Head Office 600/1, ... vs State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. ...
Judges: Arun Tandon, Sangeeta Chandra
20 December, 2016·He states that spot inspection has been made and the facts and material collected are being examined for coming to the conclusion as to whether the use of the land allotted has been made for the purpose assigned or not. We only provide that after examination of the records if it is found that the la...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shriram General Insurance ... vs Heera Lal And 9 Others
Judges: Anjani Kumar Mishra
19 December, 2016·This application is not cognizable for this Bench. Registry is directed to put up, the same before the appropriate Bench. Order Date :- 19.12.2016 A. Tripathi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Kumar Rawat & 139 Ors. vs Food Corporation Of India Thru. ...
Judges: Rajan Roy
19 December, 2016·Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel appearing for FCI informs the Court that there is no question of de-notification in this case as notification abolishing contract labour at Taalkatora Depot of Lucknow under Section 10 of the Act, 1972 itself was never issued, therefore, there is no question of de-n...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.