M/S Prema Construction vs Asstt. Commissioner, Central ...
Judges: Sudhir Agarwal, Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
24 August, 2016·4. In Kerala State Electricity Board and another Vs. Kurien E. Kalathil and others 2000 (6) SCC 293, Court said that interpretation and implementation of a clause in a contract cannot be subject-matter of a writ petition. Whether a contract envisages actual payment or not is a question of constructi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod Kumar Parihar vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Pramod Kumar Srivastava
24 August, 2016·Learned counsel for the applicant contended that before filing of the complaint case and before the presentation of cheque in question in bank, the FIR was lodged in police that complainant had forcibly obtained the signatures of applicant on cheques no. 641871 to 641885. His contention is that on t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shashank Bansal vs State Of U.P. And Another
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
24 August, 2016·It is further contended that a complaint was also filed by the opposite party no.2 against the applicant with the allegations of demand of dowry and that on account of non-fulfilment of demand of dowry she was ousted from her matrimonial house. Aggrieved, applicant has filed a Criminal Misc. Applica...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Singh @ Raju vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
24 August, 2016·Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for and is granted a week's time to file rejoinder affidavit. If the rejoinder affidavit is not filed on the next date of listing, interim order granted in favour of the revisionist shall automatically stand vacated. Let the matter be listed in the week comm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarojini Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, Vijay Laxmi
24 August, 2016·All the respondents may file their counter affidavits within three weeks. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks thereafter. List thereafter." The stand that had been taken then was about the delegation of power on the Adhyaksha (Chairman) of the Zila Panchayat in this regard und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Iliyas And 5 Ors. vs Smt. Ram Dulari And 6 Ors
Judges: Ritu Raj Awasthi
24 August, 2016·20. It is submitted that the plaintiff has to succeed on the strength of his own case and could not rely upon the weakness of the defence. The case of oral agreement extending the period of limitation, pleaded was not proved by the plaintiff by leading any positive evidence on record, hence the theo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhishek Kumar Singh & 3 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ...
Judges: Rajan Roy
24 August, 2016·In view of the aforesaid factual scenario the decision of the Board to round off the marks is apparently in the teeth of the statutory provisions and is not sustainable in law. Reference may be made in this regard to the decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of Orrisa Public Service Commission ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gendan Lal vs C.B.I., A.C.B., Ghaziabad
Judges: Naheed Ara Moonis
24 August, 2016·This is a third bail application moved on behalf of the applicant Gendan Lal. The first bail application was rejected by this Court vide order 29.10.2014. Second bail application was moved on behalf of the applicant which was released by this Court and thereafter the same was rejected by another Ben...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Irfan And 22 Orthers vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Judges: B Amit Sthalekar
24 August, 2016·4. Jyoti Jha 5. Yashpal Singh (petitioner no.14) 6. Pallavi Sakyavar 7. Rachana Dwivedi For the post of A.N.M. the educational testimonials/documents of the following selected candidates were not verified; 1. Rinki Devi 2. Santoshi Devi 3. Bina Kumari 4. Chandravati Pal 5. Kalpana Devi 6 Sadhan 7. K...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Branch Manager Central Bank Of ... vs Ivth.Additional District Judge ...
Judges: Devendra Kumar Arora
24 August, 2016·This Court after examining the material on record and the submissions advanced by the parties to the writ petition recorded a finding that Prescribed Authority had jurisdiction to entertain the application under- Section 18 of the Act read with Section 15 of 1936 Act with respect to claim of the app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.