Dayanand @ Pappu And Others vs State Of U.P.And Another
Judges: Yogesh Chandra Gupta
01 March, 2011·No report from the Mediation Centre has been received. It is revealed that Rs.8000/- in pursuance of the order dated 30.11.2010 were deposited on 4.1.2010. It is informed by learned counsel for the applicant that he deposited the aforesaid amount after obtaining permission from the Court, but no suc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahmatullah Khan @ Abbu Sahab vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges: Rajes Kumar
01 March, 2011·List thereafter. Till the next date of listing, the realization of demand shall remain stayed provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the demand towards deficient stamp duty within 30 days. Any amount already deposited shall be given adjustment. Order Date :- 1.3.2011 OP...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
In The Matter Of: M/S Electra ... vs Official Liquidator, U.P. & ...
Judges: Rajes Kumar
01 March, 2011·The appellant claimed a sum of Rs.7,32,646/- from the Company in liquidation being a worker of the said Company. As against the aforesaid claim, a sum of Rs.5,49,526/- has been allowed by the Official Liquidator and the balance amount has been rejected in the absence of any evidence. The contention ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Kumar @ Rajjo (Since Deceased) ... vs Vinod Kumar Chaturvedi (Since ...
Judges: Rakesh Tiwari
01 March, 2011·Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance paragraph no. 9 of the writ petition in which the order-sheet is quoted from 06.02.1986 up to 25.05.1987 and submitted that Ramesh Chandra Sharma i.e. respondent no. 2 neither contested the case and had not filed any written statement as he was in collu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Shanker vs State Of U.P.Through Secy.
Judges: Rajiv Sharma
01 March, 2011·Dismissed vide order of my date passed on separate sheets contained in writ petition no. 1282(SS) of 1999. Order Date :- 1.3.2011 MH/-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Somnath Katyal vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges: Rajes Kumar
01 March, 2011·Issue notice to respondent no. 5 returnable at an early date. List thereafter. Till the next date of listing, the realization of demand shall remain stayed provided the petitioner deposits 50% of the demand towards deficient stamp duty within 30 days. Any amount already deposited shall be given adju...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.