Vishnu Shankar Bisaria vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges:
11 January, 2010·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. We have been taken through the allegations contained in the F.I.R. and the material on record. Issue notice to respondent no. 3 who may file counter affidavit within four weeks. Learned A.G.A. may also file cou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Union Of India Thru General ... vs Rama Kant S/O Late Arjun
Judges:
11 January, 2010·The petitioners are aggrieved by the judgment dated 21st August, 2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.426 of 2006, Rama Kant Vs. Union of India allowing the claim petition and directing the respondents to release the withheld amount of gratuity with interest and to pay the r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Faijan vs State Of U.P. Thru Sec. Home Lko. ...
Judges:
11 January, 2010·Heard learned counsel for the petitioner learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. registered at case crime no. 754 of 2009 under section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activity (Prevention) Act 1986, P.S. Loni, District Ghaziabad. Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rameshwari Devi [ U/A 227 ] vs Civil Judge (J.D.) Rae Bareli And ...
Judges:
11 January, 2010·In view of the order, which is proposed to be passed notices to respondent no. 2 is dispensed with. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no.2 in the year 2008 filed a suit for permanent injunction against the present petitioner, which was registered as Regular Suit No.888 of 20...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anoop @ Gattu Dubey vs State Of U.P. & Others
Judges:
11 January, 2010·We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. In the case of Mahendra Lal Das v State of Bihar 2002 SCC (Crl) 110 it has been held by the Supreme Court that while interference by Courts at investigation stage is not called for, the investigating agency cannot be given lati...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhalla @ Niraj vs State Of U.P.
Judges:
11 January, 2010·It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that false recovery against the applicant has been shown . There is no public witness of the incident. It is further submitted that infact the alleged incident...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Prakash @ Tillu And Others vs Smt. Malti Devi And Another
Judges:
11 January, 2010·No one appeared on behalf of revisionists. Sri Babu Lal, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 is present. Learned A.G.A. on behalf of State is also present. Heard and perused the record. It is revealed that in Criminal Misc. Application No. 11595/04 the accused persons/revisionists of this revision ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sharan Pandey vs Nagar Palika Parishad & Others
Judges:
11 January, 2010·The petitioner contends that there are certain medical claim benefits relating to the petitioner's wife which are pending consideration before the respondents. Sri Pradeep Kumar has accepted notice on behalf of Respondents. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Raj Kumari & Others vs Dy. Director Of Consolidation, ...
Judges:
11 January, 2010·Petitioner Counsel :- A.S. Diwekar Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Ajay Shankar,Gulab Singh,TriVeni Shankar,Vidya Sagar Hon'ble Bala Krishna NaraVana.J. Passed over on the illness slip of Sri A.S. Diwakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. List in the next cause list. Order Date :- 11.1.2010 R.C....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.