Smt. Baijanti Devi Inter College ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: R Tiwari
14 March, 2008·3. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that on 8th March, 2008 respondent Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 came with some copies from out side in which answers had been solved. They wanted to substitute those copies in place of the copies submitted by the students after the examination. In th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Ram Raikawar S/O Ganesh ... vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Krishna Devi ...
Judges: A K Singh
14 March, 2008·2. Briefly stated that the facts are that a Criminal Complaint was filed by Smt. Krishna Devi (opposite party No. 2) before learned IInd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 7, Jhansi, which was registered as Criminal Case No. 2339/04 Smt. Krishna Devi v. Raju Raikawara and Ors. alleging ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Vinod Kumar Rai Son Of Late Sri ... vs The Income Tax Appellate ...
Judges: S Harkauli, S Agarwal
14 March, 2008·5. Now comes the last submission that merely because Sri R.K. Jain, the then CIT (A) was transferred, it would not denude him the inherent jurisdiction to decide the pending appeals and, therefore, only on this ground, the order passed by the then CIT (A) could not have been set aside by the Tribuna...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sharda Saharan vs Director General Of Police And ...
Judges: V Sahai, R Misra
13 March, 2008·1. Mahish Goel v. Mohan Lal Mehra and Ors. 1995 (2) ARC 48. 2. Mohan Lal Mehra v. State of U.P. and Ors. 1995 (1) ARC 553. 3. Jai Prakash Vashisht v. Addl. District Magistrate (E), Meemt and Ors. 1995 (1) ARC 476 : 1995 (2) AWC 995. We have gone through these judgments. The facts were different. In ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjai Kumar Son Of Yogeshwar ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: H Gokhale, V Saran
13 March, 2008·1. Heard Mr. Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate, in support of this appeal. Mr. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel, appears for the respondents. 2. The appellants are students, who claim to have done one year's course in Diploma in Physical Education from an institution in district Balia. What is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satendra Son Of Dharam Pal, Dharam ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Smt. ...
Judges: A K Singh
13 March, 2008·1. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the accused for quashing the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 313 of 2006 (Smt. Sharda v. Satendra and Ors.) under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498-A I.P.C. and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the court o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Horam Son Of Suresh Singh Yadav (In ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: R Singh
12 March, 2008·1. The applicant Horam hag filed criminal Sail application No. 3351 of 2008, the applicant Amit Kumar, Dharmendra Singh alias Mintoo have filed Criminal misc, bell application no, 713 of 2008 and the applicants Sudeep Kumar Yadav and Mithilsh Kumar Yadav have filed criminal misc. bail application No...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
P.B. Society Jewellers vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: S Harkauli, R Sharma
12 March, 2008·1. After hearing learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Shambhu Chopra, appearing for the Respondents Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, we dispose of this writ petition with the direction to the Respondent No. 2 to decide the petitioner's application under S...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Kumar Pandey S/O Sri Shaym ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: J Sahai, S Mehrotra
12 March, 2008·3. The submission of the petitioner's counsel is that the loan which was advanced to the petitioner was not under any state sponsored scheme and therefore the provisions of the U.P. Public Money (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 would not be attracted for recovery of the loan. Such a loan submits the pet...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nizam Uddin And Ors. vs Nagar Nigam And Anr.
Judges: K Murari
11 March, 2008·8. On the question of balance of convenience, the lower appellate court came to the conclusion that since no lease deed on the basis of which the plaintiffs claim their right and possession has been filed and the suit property having been acquired under the provision of Land Acquisition Act and has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.