Ved Prakash vs Smt. Shanti Devi
Judges: R Tiwari
18 September, 2006·6. In Rent Appeal No. 1 of 2002 filed by the tenant, the findings of the prescribed authority were upset by the appellate court holding that the landlord could not prove that his second son had met with an accident and that son, who is studying and that he can do business with his elder brother, as ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Nath Son Of Gahrawan vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: P Srivastava
18 September, 2006·1. Heard Sri Triveni Shanker, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh Advocate for the contesting respondents. 2. The order of the Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 28.8.1981 is impugned in the instant writ petition. The controversy in the instant writ petition arises ou...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hazi Mohd. Harun S/O Sri Ali Raza vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
18 September, 2006·8. Thereafter it appears that the impugned order was passed by the State government and the letter dated 10.3.2006, addressed to the DG CBCID, Lucknow, signed by the Under Secretary was issued, which mentions that in response to the complaint of Shri Wali Ullah, ex-President of Samajwadi Party, Fate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bakridi And Ors. vs Incharge District Judge And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
18 September, 2006·3. The earned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that no reasons are required to be given for producing a witness without the summons of the Court under Order XVI, Rule 1A, C.P.C. and that a witness could be produced without applying for summons under Order XVI, Rule 1, C.P.C. The earned Counsel f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar Son Of Late Jagdish ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Agarwal
18 September, 2006·5. Recruitment of a member of the family of the deceased:-(1) case a Government servant dies in harness after the commencement of these rules and the spouse of the deceased government servant is not already employed under the Central Government or a Stale Government or a Corporation owned or control...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mustaq Alias Mustafa vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
15 September, 2006·9. He further said that as per Section 2(d) of Cr. P.C. meaning of complaint is as follows: (d) "complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagannath Son Of Shri Matai vs The Board Of Revenue And Ors.
Judges: J Sahai
15 September, 2006·1. The petitioners application for cancellation of the patta of respondent No. 5, which was allowed by the Collector. The order was challenged by respondent No. 5 in revision and was set aside by the Additional Commissioner. The petitioner challenged the order of the Additional Commissioner in revis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Shankar vs Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.) And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
15 September, 2006·2. The petitioner filed release application, registered as P.A. Case No. 9 of 1998 Rama Shankar v. Shiv Prasad and Ors. under Section 21 (1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 for release of shop in the possession of tenant-respondents. 3. It appears ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mansur Ahmad S/O Abdul Haque, ... vs State Of U.P. And Maqbool Ahmad S/O ...
Judges: M Mittal
15 September, 2006·4. Learned Trial Court asked the prosecutor if he wanted to give any additional evidence and the learned A.D.G.C. (Crl) stated that no further evidence was to be given. Learned Counsel for the accused appellants, was also asked if he wanted to further cross examine any witness and he expressed his d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar Dubey vs Ganga Shankar Tiwari
Judges: R Tiwari
15 September, 2006·4. It is stated that a compromise was entered into between the parties outside the Court wherein it was agreed that respondent would file the compromise in the Court but it was not filed. 5. The trial court vide order dated 21.9.2003 dismissed the aforesaid application under Order IX, Rule 13, C.P.C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.