Mahendra Kumar, Ex-Cpl No. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: B Sapru
27 September, 2006·5. It is the petitioner's contention that the disability which he has suffered in his eyes was during the period of service in Indian Air Force and was attributable to the conditions of his service. He pleads that it was on account of bursting of the fluid which entered in his eyes that he suffered ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shiv Shankar Awasthi Son Of Late ... vs Director Sericulture And ...
Judges: B Sapru
27 September, 2006·12. The second argument of the argument of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that under Rule 9(2) of the U.P. Government (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1991 which applies to the petitioner lays down that the disciplinary authority shall, if it disagrees with the findings of enquiry officer o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maulana Murshid Ali Quadri Son Of ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
27 September, 2006·3. The allegations in the FIR insofar as it related to the petitioner interalia were that three persons Kumail Ahmad Asharfi, Diwan Ahmad Ali and Qamrul Hasan were illegally paid salaries knowingly that their appointments were illegal and that they had not been appointed and thus the payment of Rs. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Pal Singh Son Of Shri Gaya ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: P Mithal
27 September, 2006·(2) No such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges [* * *] Provided that where it is proposed after such inquir...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Paswara Chemicals Ltd., Through ... vs Deputy Commissioner ...
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
27 September, 2006·... (j)(i) 'assessment year' means the twelve months ending on March 31; Section 7. Determination of turnover and assessment of tax. (1) Every dealer who is liable to pay tax under this Act shall submit such return or returns of his turnover at such intervals, within such period, in such from and ve...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Kumar Misra Son Of Sri Ram Raj ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: P Mithal
27 September, 2006·4. In Smt. Shrisht Dhawan v. Shaw Bros. , it has been held as under: Fraud and collusion vitiate even the most solemn proceedings in any civilized system of jurisprudence. 5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court by its various pronouncements has provided that dishonesty should not permitted to bear the fruit a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Paramount Trading Corporation
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
27 September, 2006·2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in confirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)'s finding that the proviso to Section 187(2) of the Act was applicable and there was a dissolution of the firm on the death of one of its partners on June...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jawwad Ali Shah, Imambara Muslim ... vs The Vice Chancellor, Deen Dayal ...
Judges: S Srivastava
27 September, 2006·4. Facts being tangled and intertwined, the entire record was summoned by this Court, which was produced by Smt. Sunita Agarwal, learned Counsel for the University. When a question was posed to Smt. Sunita Agarwal whether after receiving proceeding of election dated 27.11.2005 submitted by Opp. Part...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pappu Son Of Nihal vs State Of U.P. And Bhim Sen S/O ...
Judges: V Chaturvedi
27 September, 2006·6. The brief facts of the case are that a F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant and other accused persons in respect of an incident dated 18.1.2006 under Section 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 452, 427, 323, 504, 506 I PC at crime No. 29 of 2006 at police station Achnera District Agra. The Investigating...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Motilal Padampat Udyog Ltd. vs Cit
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
26 September, 2006·2. The reference relates to the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78. 3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise of the present reference are as follows : 4. During the assessment year 1976-77, the assessee had claimed deduction for Rs. 6,72,294 being the liability for payment of market fee. 5. Accordi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.