Sadhna Yadav Alias Babli vs Rent Control And Eviction ...
Judges: R Tiwari
18 October, 2006·;g fd esjs Hkou ds Hkwfe [k.M ds ,d cM+s dejs ftlds vkxs doMZ vkaxu gS mlds ckn ,d NksVk dejk gS fQj cjkenk thuk ikl gS ,oa ckFk esa foxr 4 o"kZ ls Jherh ccyh ;kno iRuh fot; mQZ dYyw vukf/kdkj fcuk ,ykVesUV rFkk esjh bPNk ,oa lgefr ds fcuk ,ykVesUV rFkk esjh bPNk ,oa lgefr ds fcuk voS/kkfud :Ik ls d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ramesh Chandra Saboo Son Of Sri ... vs The Collector And Ors.
Judges: S Srivastava
18 October, 2006·2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner urged that impugned order of cancellation was passed by Additional District Magistrate without issuing notice or giving opportunity of hearing to petitioner. He further urged that order gr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar Pant Son Of Sri D.D. ... vs Joint Director Of Education, ...
Judges: P Kant, S Misra
18 October, 2006·3. The plea that the persons who have been retained in service are junior to the appellant and that the principle of 'last come first go' has not been followed, would necessarily require the appellant to plead that the persons who have been retained in service were not only junior to the appellant b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandan Son Of Aanganu vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Manoj ...
Judges: V Prasad
17 October, 2006·The provisions of the code therefore do not in any way stand in the way of a Magistrate to direct the police to register a case at the police station and then investigate into the same. In our opinion when an order for investigation under Section 156(3) of the code is to be made the proper direction...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Malkhan Singh S/O Hukum Singh vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
17 October, 2006·5. However, from the record we find that the date of representation is 26th December, 2005 when the date of filing of the present writ petition is 24th January, 2006. But for the purpose of compliance of the order no contempt application has been filed before the Court to obtain an appropriate order...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Waqf Madarsa And Yateem Khana No. ... vs Controller, U.P. Sunni Central ...
Judges: S Khan
17 October, 2006·2. Thereafter proceedings under Section 57-A of UP. Muslim Waqf Act, 1960 were initiated and completed by the Waqf Board. Waqf Board through its Controller by order dated 4.5.1990 held that the properties in dispute belonged to Waqf No. 21-Extension List and not to the petitioner Waqf. The said orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Hamid Son Of Late Sri Mohd. ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principle ...
Judges: P Kant, S Misra
17 October, 2006·6. It is the specific case of the petitioner in the writ petition and more particularly asserted in paragraphs 16,17,18,19,and 21-(a) that despite the fact that the petitioner denied the charges levelled against him in his reply, he was not afforded any opportunity to participate in the disciplinary...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Mohan, Social ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi) Through ...
Judges: A Yog, R Rastogi
17 October, 2006·4. We are of the view that the High Court fell into patent error in holding that once the University admits a student, the right to contest the students' union Elections is a part of the right to education and as such is a fundamental right. The Court in N.P. Ponnuswamy v. Returning Officer, Namakka...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dushyant Singh Son Of Shri Praveen ... vs Sri Ram Prakash Sharma Son Of Shri ...
Judges: T Agarwala
17 October, 2006·6. Sri S.N. Varma, the learned senior counsel contended that the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 had no prima facie case in his favour and that the suit was filed by concealing material facts. It was contended that the plaintiff-respondent did not disclose the resolution dated 28.9.2003 of no confidence ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Angad Yadava Son Of Sri Ram Badan vs Election Commission Of India ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
16 October, 2006·6. The controversy lies in a very narrow compass, as to whether the Returning Officer could declare that petitioner was disqualified to contest the election for a period of six years from the date of his release from the jail, i.e., upto 24.11.2006 as he had been released on bail by the order of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.