Nighat Naseem vs Raj Kumar And Ors.
Judges: R Tiwari
06 October, 2006·6. The petition has been filed on the ground that she is 'heir' as defined under Section 3(2) of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972. Section 3 which defines tenant' is as under: 3. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires: (a) "tenant", in relation to a building, means a person by whom its rent is ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamlesh Son Of Chandra Bali And ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
05 October, 2006·6. Likewise paragraph 9 of S.M. Datta v. State of Gujarat aptly reiterates the same position: 9. We respectfully record our concurrence therewith. Criminal proceedings, in the normal course of events ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage, unless the same amounts to an abuse of the process of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Singh Wife Of Udai Pratap ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: S Agarwal
05 October, 2006·8. It is not disputed by the learned Counsel for the parties, that in the State of Uttar Pradesh, reservation for physically handicapped persons has been prescribed by U.P. Public Services (Reservation for Physically Handicapped, Dependents of Freedom-Fighters and Ex-Servicemen) Act, 1993 (hereinaft...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagar Nigam Through Its Municipal ... vs Smt. Rabiya Begum And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
05 October, 2006·2. It Is alleged by the petitioner that Sri Jata Shanker Pandey, the advocate of the petitioner before the District Court appeared before the trial court in relation to some other matters of the Nagar Nigam. The Court asked the advocate as to why he was not appearing in the present case. It is furth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhupendra Pratap Singh Son Of ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: D Gupta
05 October, 2006·Provided also that in case of direct appointment made in short and leave vacancies it shall not be necessary for the appointing authority to give any. notice or any pay in lieu thereof before terminating the service.... 12. The records of the Writ Petition indicate that the process for making the se...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Chandra vs Additional District Judge Xth And ...
Judges: R Tiwari
05 October, 2006·The order dated 28.4.1999 is as under: mHk; Ik{kksa ds vf/koDrk mifLFkrA 43&x }kjk izfroknh us vkns'k fnukad 22&4&1999 fu;r djds lquokbZ dk vuqjks/k fd;k gSA tks leu ls lefiZr gSa lquokbZ okn fu.kZ; gsrq lqjf{kr gS vr% 43&x vLohd`rA The judgment was delivered on the same day. 4. Aggrieved by the afo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
No. 810706369 Naik Ibrar Khan Son ... vs Union Of India (Uoi), Represented ...
Judges: A Bhushan
05 October, 2006·7. The submission of the petitioner that this Court after being prima facie satisfied entertained the writ petition vide order dated 24.2.2004 needs to be considered first. From the order dated 24.2.2004 it is clear that the observation in the said order was made by this Court on the basis of prima ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shree Ram Fuels Private Limited ... vs Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
05 October, 2006·4. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 5. Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that in the assessment year. 1989-90 certain coal which were not useable were sold after taking the permission from the Coal India Limited vide letter dated 10.1.1990. He submitted that only those coal which wer...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sareen Sports Industries Through ... vs Deputy Commissioner ...
Judges: R Agrawal, V Nath
04 October, 2006·iv) award cost of the writ petition to the petitioner. 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are as follow: According to the petitioner, it is a partnership firm duly registered as a dealer under the provision of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as "th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Narendra Pratap Singh Son Of Shri ... vs Station House Officer, Nisar ...
Judges: V Prasad
04 October, 2006·4. Since at the stage of 156(3) Cr. P.C. the accused has got no right to be heard, therefore, I do not consider it proper to issue notice to respondent No. 2 and 3 Nisar Ahmad and Bhairo Nath Yadav who are proposed accused persons and opposite parties in this revision. 5. Learned Counsel for the rev...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.