Mukeem Ullah Son Of Late Sri Naim ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
07 March, 2006·10. The chargesheet against the accused/petitioners Mustkeem Ullah and Asgar Ali, according to the second F.I.R., has been submitted in the court and cognizance has been taken by the concerned court which is not disputed. Therefore, the petition regarding both the accused persons has become infructu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Santoshi Lal Son Of Sri Bhagwan Das vs Ist Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: S Khan
07 March, 2006·30. Conjoint reading of Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) and Sub-section (7) of Section 21 makes it clear that where the possession is sought by the randlord on the ground of bona fide requirement and during the pendency of the application, the landlord dies, his legal representatives can prosecute suc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Akhilesh Pratap Singh And Anr. vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: S Kumar
07 March, 2006·6. The writ petition was entertained and respondents were granted time to file counter-affidavit and it was also directed to maintain the status quo. 7. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioners that the finding rerecorded by the court below that as the Paper No. 84-Ka contained the signatu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gopalji Rai Son Of Shri Dharam Dev ... vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: A Tandon
07 March, 2006·3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends as follows: (a) that the preliminary enquiry, which was conducted in the matter was illegal, inasmuch as the complaint was not supported by an affidavit. (b) that the petitioners were not permitted to participate in the preliminary enquiry. (c) that ord...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Simar Jeet Kaur Wife Of Sri ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: A Tandon
06 March, 2006·4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the records of the case. Since the facts involved in the present writ petition are not in dispute, it would be worthwhile to reproduce Rule 8(2) Proviso (B) of U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 as is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandra Pal Singh Son Of Sri Mangal ... vs U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. ...
Judges: R Tiwari
06 March, 2006·Contention of Counsel for the petitioner 8. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after hearing the parties, the Court vide interim order dated 3.2.2005 had directed the respondents to issue appointment letters to the petitioners in pursuance of the Select List dated 23.8.2003 or to show cause by ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Shankar Jain vs Bar Council Of India And Ors.
Judges: J Bhalla, D V Sharma
06 March, 2006·9. In para 98 of the said Judgment, it has further been pointed out as follows: (SCC pp. 345-46) 98. While this Court has laid down a chain of notable decisions with all emphasis at their command about the importance and significance of this newly developed doctrine of P.I.L., it has also hastened t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Sadab Hasan Son Of Syed ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its ...
Judges: A Lala, S Shanker
06 March, 2006·2. Petitioner No. 2, the girl, is produced before this Court by the police. Dispute arose previously in connection with her age. this Court was pleased to direct to go for ossification test by an order dated 24.1.2006. Thereafter, other problem arose in connection with the appropriate ossification t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dwarikesh Sugar Industry Limited ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh Through ...
Judges: V Saran
06 March, 2006·2. Heard Sri Yashwant Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Sn A.K. Misra for contesting Respondent No. 3 and Sri Ravindra Singh for Respondent No. 4 - Cane Cooperative Society, Nazibabad. Counter and rejoinder affi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Anand Swaroop S/O Late Sukkhan Lal ... vs State Of U.P. And Sri Brij Bhushan ...
Judges: R Rastogi
06 March, 2006·8. The complainant Brij Bhushan Parashar filed counter affidavits in both the cases submitting therein that the order of this Court in both the revisions was passed on merits, and so the applications for recall of that order are not maintainable. 9. I have heard learned Counsel for both the parties ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.