Prabhu Niwas Alias Kapil Deo And ... vs Laxmi Narain And Ors.
Judges: U Pandey
15 February, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This petition has been directed against the order of appellate court dated 25.1.2006 whereby petitioners' application for amendment under Order VI, Rule 17, C.P.C. has been rejected. 3. The petitioners have filed a suit for permanent injunction and cancel...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Kumar Son Of Late ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary, ...
Judges: V Sahai, B A Zaidi
15 February, 2006·5. As appears in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents, the aforesaid conversion of entries as noted above and without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner has not been disputed in anyway, therefore, conversion or down gradation of outstanding entries to good entries...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahesh Chandra Sharma S/O Sri ... vs Uttar Pradesh State Road ...
Judges: S Agarwal
15 February, 2006·7. Considering the first submission of the petitioner that the authority has wrongly believed the evidence produced on behalf of the department and his defence evidence has been disbelieved illegally, the mute question as to what is scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters. 8. The department...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ainulhaque S/O Shri Banarasi ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: R Tiwari
15 February, 2006·8. The petitioner moved appeal which appears to have remained pending for some time. The petitioner then filed Civil Misc. Writ No. 56864 of 2005 which was disposed of vide judgment dated 12.9.2005 with the direction that the appeal be decided by the appellate authority within three weeks of filing ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Kumar Verma And Anr. vs Smt. Padma Jindal And Anr.
Judges: P Srivastava
15 February, 2006·1. Heard Sri Y.K. Sinha, learned Counsel for the revisionists and Sri Anoop Tripathi, advocate for the caveator-respondents. 2. As agreed between the parties, this revision is being heard and finally decided at this stage itself. 3. The order dated 13.1.2006, passed by Additional District Judge Cour...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Kumar S/O Ram Loten Prasad vs State Of U.P. Through Principal ...
Judges: Y Singh, R Rastogi
15 February, 2006·(i) To issue a Writ, Order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 14.10.2005 passed by Respondent No. 2 and notice dated 18.10.2005 issued by office of respondent No. 2. (ii) To issue a Writ Order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rafiquddin Son Of Azizuddin And ... vs State Of U.P. And Smt. Nafeesa ...
Judges: V Prasad
15 February, 2006·1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and learned AGA. 2. After investigation a final report was submitted by the police. Respondent No. 2 filed a I protest petition in which she did not aver any material other than which is contained in the case diary In the affidavit which was filed in suppo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash Trivedi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: A Yog, P Krishna
15 February, 2006·5. That, thereupon, the assessment proceedings for the assessment years 1990-91 to 1992-93 were completed under Section 143(3) of the Act, interest under Sections 234A, 234B and 234C of the Act was also imposed for the assessment years 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93. 6. That, on May 23, 1996, the Cent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nazim Son Of Niyaz Ahmad vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: A Bhushan
15 February, 2006·5. The Section 5(1)C(ii) of the UP. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 has it institute of the relevant period is quoted below:- 5. Effect of notification under Section 4(2).- (1) Upon the publication of the notification under Sub-section (2) of Section 4 in the Official Gazettee, the consequences,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Uttar Pradesh Cricket ... vs State Of U.P. Through Its Director ...
Judges: S Harkauli, V Nath
14 February, 2006·4. Accepting this situation, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is pressing this writ petition for a third prayer given below which has not been made in writing. According to the petitioner it has applied to the BCCI for affiliation of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.