Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shri R.M. Malhotra, Pro. Malhotra ...
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
30 September, 2005·2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1984-85. The assessee, who is an individual, carries on proprietary business in the name of M/s Malhotra Nursing & Maternity Home. The assessee's claim of investment allowance with reference to ultra sound machine equipment shown by the name of Echoscan ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Unied India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Manju Devi And Ors.
Judges: R Misra, K Murari
30 September, 2005·1. This first appeal from order has been filed challenging the award made by Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarding a sum of Rs. 3,89,962 as compensation on account of death of one Bal Govind. 2. The facts are that the deceased was in employment as a driver of the truck belonging to respondent...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Someshwar Saran Kothiwal
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
30 September, 2005·"We have heard the learned representatives of the parties at length and have also gone through the relevant record. We find ourselves in agreement with the submission made by the learned AR for the assessee that the learned CWT Appeals) having decided to draw the mantle or the Assessing Officer when...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner Sales Tax vs S/S Arease Agrovate Industries ...
Judges: P Krishna
30 September, 2005·Entry No.10 :- Cattle fodder including green fodder, chuni, bhusi, chhilka, chokar, javi (popularly known as ghurjai) and gowar, but not including khali (oil cake), rice, polish, rice bran or rice husk. 7. It may be mentioned here that the entry No. 10 of the aforesaid notification was substituted b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shashi Kala Daughter Of Ram Autar ... vs State Of U.P. Through ...
Judges: R Deepak
30 September, 2005·2. Counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit and affidavit regarding the facts of the case have been filed. 3. Heard Sri Rupak Chaubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.D. Singh Shekhar, learned counsel for the respondent, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the entire record. 4. The fact...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ahmed Ashraf Zilani Son Of Shri ... vs Principal Secretary Nagar Vikas, ...
Judges: S Misra
30 September, 2005·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that once services were confirmed in the notified area committee on 15.6.67 and he was absorbed in the centralized services by the order dated 24.9.71 then he would be entitled to retirement benefits and the respondents cannot treat him as a tempor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar Son Of Jai Narain ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
30 September, 2005·19. It has been contended by Shri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate, representing the appellant that the witnesses produced by the prosecution could not be relied upon. P.W. 1 Bhagwan Deen was not an immediate neighbour of Virendra Kumar and Jal Narain and that he was unlikely to have reached...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Bilal Son Of Naseeruddin vs State Of U.P. And Chand Muyan Son Of ...
Judges: P Srivastava
30 September, 2005·1. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Anubhav Trivedi, Advocate, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State. 2. The order dated 17.9.2005 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, State v. Bilal and Ors., relating to case crime No. 112 of 2005, under Sections 3...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Shankar Pasi S/O Samai Lal vs State Of U.P.
Judges: I Murtaza, A Saran
30 September, 2005·14. P.W.2 Satya Narain deposed that on 5.1.98, he was sitting at the door and at about 6 p.m. two unknown persons came and enquired about Sujit Singh, who came at the door and they enquired from him about his father and took him alongwith them. One of the miscreants first assaulted him with a bomb b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bijli Cotton Mills Through Its ... vs The Commissioner Of Trade Tax
Judges: R Kumar
30 September, 2005·3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 4. Learned Counsel for the absence submitted that use of lubricant oil in the machines does not come within the purview of use in the manufacturing of goods as contemplated under Section 3-G(2) of the Act. He further submitted that vide circular no.30/79 dat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.