Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Ashok Kumar Bharti And Vijay Kumar ...
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
08 July, 2005·3. Heard Sri Shambhu Chopra, learned standing counsel for the Revenue, and Sri R.R. Agarwal, learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee. 4. Learned standing counsel submitted that merely because the notice was issued to AOP consisting of Shri Ashok Kumar, Sri Vijay Kumar Goel and Shri S.P. Garg and...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Nath Gupta vs District Judge And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
08 July, 2005·1. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the courts below relying upon the amended provisions of Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure which prescribes that the time limit for filing written statement cannot be ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Auto Center vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
08 July, 2005·6. The law of limitation is enshrined in the maxim interest reipublicae up sit finis litium (it is for the general welfare that a period be put to litigation). Rules of limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of the parties, rather the idea is that every legal remedy must be kept alive for a ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Prasad Vindhyachal ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
08 July, 2005·The applicant/assessee (hereinafter referred to as 'assessee') is an HUF and was engaged in the Sarrafa business and also had income from property and agriculture. The IT Department conducted a search at the business and residential premises on 2nd/3rd Sept., 1976. In the search conducted by the Dep...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Das Industries
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
08 July, 2005·"(b) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in confirming the order of the CIT (A) for granting renewal of registration to the Firm?" 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee/opposite party hereinafter referred to as 'assessee') was a residen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vidyarthi Advertisers vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
07 July, 2005·"Hon'ble A.K. Yog, J. Hon'ble Rakesh Sharma, J. Heard Sri Rama Kant Jaiswal, on behalf of petitioner, Sanjay Gupta. In view of our order in Writ Petition No. 4203 (MB) of 2005 passed today, this writ petition shall also be listed along with that petition on 12.7.2005 and other matters relating to en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jabir Son Of Sri Shah Mohammad vs Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...
Judges: A Tandon
07 July, 2005·4. The Insurance Company deposited the money in terms of the award dated 20th October, 2004 and thereafter initiated proceedings against the petitioner for recovery of the amount so paid in terms of the said award as quoted herein above, the case was registered as Execution Misc. Case No. 3 of 2004....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajai Kumar Singh Son Of Sri Madan ... vs High Court Of Judicature At ...
Judges: S Ambwani
07 July, 2005·2. The District Judge, Deoria advertised 48 vacancies of Class III employees to be filled up by selections vide advertisement published on 13.9.1999. Out of these 48 vacancies, 36 were on the post of Clerks in Grade III, 05 on Paid Apprentices and 07 on Stenographers. The petitioner was placed in th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanker Lal Son Of Sri Katwaru vs Additional Commissioner ...
Judges: S Srivastava
07 July, 2005·(1) Whether any person who feels affected by the order and exparte decree may prefer application to recall under Section 151 of the C.P.C and get the exparte decree set aside. (2) Whether in view of the findings of the courts below that no summons were served even on Sarvakar of Sita Ram Trust throu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Ayub And Anr. vs Xivth Additional District Judge ...
Judges: R Tiwari
07 July, 2005·1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The case has been taken up in the revised list. From the order dated 14.3.2005 it appears that three weeks' time was granted to the counsel for the petitioners for filing rejoinder affidavit. Thereafter the matter was taken up on 11.4.2005 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.