Rajendra Kumar (Sri) vs Viith Additional District Judge ...
Judges: V Nath
18 February, 2005·5. Respondent No. 2 filed appeal under Section 22 of the Act, which was registered as Rent Control Appeal No. 35 of 1998. In the appeal the respondent No. 2 filed an application for amendment of release application dated 15.1.1999, whereby paragraphs No. 3A & 4A were sought to be added in the releas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indra Pal Verma Son Of Sri Ram Dayal ... vs Sri Sri Ram Gupta And Ram Chandra ...
Judges: A Kumar
18 February, 2005·4. Learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent has relied upon a decision of this Court reported in 1984 (1) ARC 113, N.S. Datta and Ors. v. The VIIth Addl. District Judge, Allahabad and Ors. and 2004 (1) ARC 148, Sanjay Kumar and Ors. v. Subodh Kumar and Ors. for the proposition that ea...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laddan @ Jamin Abbas Hussain vs Mohd. Abbas @ Sabbo And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
18 February, 2005·2. The brief facts of the present case are that the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 are the landlord of the accommodation in question, who were residing under the guardianship of their maternal grand-father at the time when the application under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972, (In shor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Balbhadra Pandey vs General Manager (N), Indian ...
Judges: B Chauhan, D Gupta
18 February, 2005·8. It is evident from the record that the petitioner had filed ten other suits before the trial Court and five of them were after his dismissal from service in the year 1981, details and particulars thereof have been taken note of by this Court while deciding First Appeal No. 10/1991. It is further ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Commissioner, Trade Tax vs S/S Ajudhya Distillery
Judges: R Kumar
18 February, 2005·(a) sells to the Government any goods; or (b) sells to a registered dealer other than the Government goods of the description referred to in Sub-section (3) shall be liable to pay tax under this Act, with effect from such date as may he notified by the Central Government in the Official Gazette for ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Upendra Nath vs Special Judge (E.C. Act)/A.D.J. ...
Judges: A Kumar
18 February, 2005·2. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitionertenant challenges the order dated 24th November, 2000, passed by the prescribed authority and the order dated 20th July, 2004, passed by the appellate authority under the provisions of the U.P. Act No....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Santosh Mishra D/O Late Ram ... vs Smt. Prabha Pandey W/O Late Ram ...
Judges: S Srivastava
18 February, 2005·3. The controversy involved in the present revision lies in a short compass the challenge being focused on the impugned order whereby application for accepting written statement was allowed on cost of Rs. 100/-. The main brunt of the arguments advanced across the bar by the learned counsel for the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajnish Kumar vs Krishna Lal
Judges: A Kumar
18 February, 2005·"1. Whether the provisions of U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 are applicable to the building in question, if so, its effect? 2. Whether the defendant-tenant is entitled to the benefit of Section 20 (4) of the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972? 3. Whether the notice dated 19th March, 1996 by which the tenancy has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umardaraj vs Furkan Ahmad And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
18 February, 2005·3. On the pleadings of the parties and the evidence on the record the trial Court arrived at a conclusion that provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 are applicable and that the tenant had deposited rent upto 24th November, 1995 under Section 30 of the Act in Misc. Case No. 20 of 1995 in the Court of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Abdul Shakoor, Son Of Shri ... vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Khan
18 February, 2005·2. Before Consolidation officer copy of a document purported to be an Ijazatnama executed on behalf of the previous Zamindar in favour of the petitioner bearing date 15.7.1938 was also filed. 3. Consolidation Officer, Bijnore by order dated 18.12.1973 dismissed the objections which had been register...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.