Godfrey Philips India Limited, A ... vs The Director, Mandi Parishad And ...
Judges: A Bhushan
29 April, 2005·"When an authority exercises the revisional powers it necessarily acts in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity." 24. A plain reading of Section 32 shows that the Board has been clothed with the jurisdiction to look into the legality or propriety of any decision or order passed by the Committee and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nazim Son Of Kazim Ali And Bhagwan ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: I Murtaza, M Chaudhary
29 April, 2005·13. P.W. 1 M.M. Sukheja deposed that on 23.11.1998 he was posted as Station Master. At about 11.15 a.m. Assistant Station Master, Bitrohi informed on phone that one passenger has been murdered in 127 Up Train for the information to G.R P. He immediately sent a memo No. 55/30/11/98 to the G.R.P. outp...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Kumar Shakya S/O Sri. Babu ... vs State Of U.P. Through Secretary ...
Judges: A Yog, B Agarwal
29 April, 2005·7. Shri Ram Gopal Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner stated before this Court that petitioner, during pendency of this writ petition (which was presented in Court on 20-01-04), has been provided one security guard (gunner) in view of the State Government order dated 25-4-2001/Annexure-11 t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Wire Drawing ... vs Assistant Commissioner ...
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
29 April, 2005·4. We have heard Sri R.R. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner assisted by Sri Suyash Agarwal and Sri K.M. Sahai, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a duly registered dealer under the provisions of U.P. Trade Ta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Umesh Kumar, Son Of Sri Kali Charan ... vs Nagar Palika Parishad Through Its ...
Judges: R Tiwari
29 April, 2005·4. The petitioners had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 43642 of 2002 for regularization of their services in which an interim order was passed directing the respondents to make payment of the wages of the petitioners till further orders. While deciding the aforesaid writ petition the Court has obser...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi vs Prem Kishore Upadhyay And Anr.
Judges: A Kumar
29 April, 2005·4. Aggrieved thereby, the tenant-petitioner preferred an appeal Under Section 22 of the Act before the appellate authority. During the pendency of the appeal before the appellate authority, the petitioner-tenant filed an amendment application bringing certain new facts on record to the effect that o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
29 April, 2005·2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessees claim for deduction of interest on additional cane price was allowable ?" 2. Brief facts of the case are as follows: Assessee respondent (assessee) was carrying on the business ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Brig. Kapil Mohan
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
29 April, 2005·- Smt. Comilla Mohan W/o Late Col. V.R. Mohan. Smt. Comilla Mohan W/o Late Col. V.R. Mohan. 2. Trustee 2. Trustee - - Brig. Kapil Mohan S/o Late Shri N.N. Mohan. Brig. Kapil Mohan S/o Late Shri N.N. Mohan. 3. Beneficiaries 3. Beneficiaries - - First son of Hemand Mohan is son of Shri Sukhdev Mohan. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Malik Packaging Through Its ... vs The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal
29 April, 2005·3. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows:- According to the petitioner, it is a partnership firm consisting of two partners, namely, Smt. Sofia Malik and Anish Khan having 60% and 40% share respectively. It is engaged in the business of manufacturing of corruga...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Prime Products Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, R Kumar
29 April, 2005·Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in holding that for the purpose of Section 115J(1A)(iv) the word loss in terms of proviso to Section 205(1)(b) of Companies Act will mean the loss including depreciation? 2. The present reference relates to the assess...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.